“Did Aylit really follow New Genes?
The concept may be similar, but the similarity is natural under a roof that is difficult to prove legally.? past 3month 251st mini album 1house ‘SUPER REAL ME’Aillet, a girl group who debuted as a member of Hive's label Belif Lab.. survival program ‘RU Next’Members were selected through, Chairman Bang Si-hyuk produced the debut album.. After the audition program ends, Aillet will receive approx. 6Although it debuted after 1 month, ‘Hive's youngest daughter’Iran's massive publicity and 10teenagers ‘super attraction’A song with a TikTok feel that created, The center of fashion Y2K Reminiscent of the past but with added alpha ‘dreamy innocence’ The concept came together to create various new records.. However, it is an undeniable fact that even before this incident broke out, there were opinions that the concept was similar to New Genes.. First of all, when you look at it simply on the surface, there are things that the public may feel are similar. 3There are branches. number of people, hairstyle, It's choreography. both groups 5It is composed of people and has overseas members. 2Each person is included. The number of people is an element that can give a feeling of similarity in choreography formations or group pictorials.. In addition, all five members of Aillet are unified in long black hair styles, maximizing their innocence in their debut song. ‘Attention’It's like when New Jeans first stood in front of the public.. Of course, long black straight hair is not the only original style introduced by New Jeans.. However, it is a different story when the girls group together with their long hair flowing and using it as a point in the choreography.. Actually, it's Aylet's song ‘My World’The choreography in which the members turn their backs and sweep their hair is performed by New Jeans. ‘Attention’ It is similar to the choreography movement in. In addition to this movement, NewJeans' ‘Ditto’and of Reseraphim ‘EASY’A movement that seemed to have been seen in was a hot topic.. Also, A-Lit's latest follow-up song ‘Lucky Girl Syndrome (Sped Up)’New Jeans’ McDonald’s in Edo CMHand movements similar to song choreography are seen..The choreography was intentional. ‘openly’ It can be seen as a strategy aimed at gaining popularity by imitating people.. The fact that there is a lot of talk about the concept, which can be said to be the group's identity, is a challenge that Aillet, who has just debuted, must solve.. Music videos or concept photos other than the current music, The consensus among experts is that New Jeans is emerging from Eyelet in general, including promotion methods..The concept may be similar, but it is difficult to prove legally. However, it is not easy to judge it as plagiarism just because the concept is similar.. law firm(finite) Taehwan Kim, a lawyer specializing in intellectual property rights at Daeryun, “When looking at Eyelet and New Jeans as individual products, there is a high possibility that they are similar.”as “However, even though it is quite similar in terms of concept, it is difficult to determine whether it is infringing on copyright based on legal judgment., It must be examined whether it constitutes a violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act.”explained.First of all, the concept ‘idea’It is not protected by copyright law as it is an area of. This is in copyright ‘Dichotomy between ideas and expressions’They say so, Copyright protects ‘expression’limited to ‘idea’does not protect. At this time, it is not the overall concept, but the music that is each element of the concept., Choreography, If substantial similarity and a dependent relationship are recognized in the area of other copyrighted works, such as photographic works, it may constitute copyright infringement.. However, lawyer Kim Tae-hwan “The lyrics and melodies of the two groups' songs are different., There are many parts where individual choreography differs in detail depending on the flow of music.”as “If this is proceeded as a copyright infringement lawsuit, it is believed that there will be many legal defenses, so it will not be easy for copyright infringement to be recognized.”said.Even from the perspective of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, it is ambiguous.. In the case of New Jeans and Eyelet, the provisions that will be problematic are acts of confusion such as business signs, etc., Stealing ideas, There is unauthorized theft of achievements, etc.. Regarding this, lawyer Kim Tae-hwan said: “From the victim's side ‘The person who stole the idea did not know about the idea or it was not widely known in the same industry.’I have to prove it, It is not easy because you have to prove that it is special or unique.”While “Also, whether the concept of New Jeans can be protected? ‘unique achievements’ It may be difficult to prove”gave an opinion. This is because it is not easy to prove that all the individual elements that make up the concept are new and have not been announced..There is nothing new under the sky. But we still have to try to make a difference., If that effort is visible, no one will have an issue with the perceived similarity.. Therefore, the controversy over Aylit and New Genes plagiarism is also connected to the issue of Hive’s morality.. Attorney Taehwan Kim “In areas such as creation or art, copying a concept is morally problematic.. The controversy arose over the fact that the concept was copied from a parent company, not a competitor, due to moral awareness., It seems like a situation sufficient to be criticized in terms of ethics.”said.Similarity under one roof is natural? In fact, let alone the similarity of the concept, ‘Is it okay for labels with the same parent company to cause such a plagiarism controversy?’Opinions are divided among industry officials on the issue of. Critic Kim Young-dae ‘Amplified’ In the podcast “Hive is now in a position to lead the gods., Rather than feeling like they are presenting something, they are expressing the most perfect state they can create. (repeatedly) is creating”I felt regretful..However, there is also a view that there is no problem because they are the same Hive labels.. One industry insider said “Just as Samsung refers to its predecessor when making the next version of its mobile phone,, Idol groups released by the same company should be allowed to have similarities”as “Other agencies also have similarities between their groups.”He said. Then he “Although CEO Min Hee-jin is currently leading Adore, he originally 2019Chief Brand Officer when joining Hive in 2018(CBO)joined the company. Of course, HiBro would have wanted to utilize Min Hee-jin’s capabilities across the entire group.”said.So, since it is a relationship between a parent company and its subsidiaries, is there a legal problem if New Genes' success grammar was used to promote group-level profits?. Currently, each label under Hive is dedicated to content production., Public relations and legal affairs are managed exclusively by the parent company, Hive.. Attorney Taehwan Kim “Hive is the company's ‘stable sales’A decision may have been made to actively utilize the process of reproducing similar content.”As a precedent worth referencing, 2017sentenced to years SPPIntroducing the Joseon ruling. At that time, Lee Nak-young SPPChairman Chosun is under the management of creditors. SPPPurchase materials for affiliated companies with Joseon's funds SPPHe was accused of breach of trust for causing damage by transferring shipbuilding scrap metal to another affiliate.. However, the Supreme Court did not recognize intentional breach of trust, judging that it was done within the scope of reasonable management discretion.. It was the first Supreme Court ruling that stated that support between affiliates within a group cannot be considered a breach of trust if it is for the common benefit of the group and not for a specific person or company..Attorney Taehwan Kim “When applying this precedent, although the field is different, Hive(parent company)autumn eyelet(Subsidiary affiliation)Can this be seen as an act of support for, If so, it depends on whether there is room for it to be considered for the group's common benefit. ‘crime of breach of trust’It seems that there is room to influence whether or not the”said. If support is provided at the parent company level,, Also, if it is judged to be in the group's common interest, the method of success of New Genes can now be seen in Aylit., Next time, Aylet's method of success may be discovered in the next group.. [View full article] - “Did Eyelet really follow New Jeans??