Page title background (PC version)Page title background (mobile version)

Deals & Cases

Assault, Indecent act by compulsion

Forcible Indecent Act Attorney Assistance Case | Non-Prosecution for a Client Charged With a Forcible Indecent Act and Assault

The client who sought out the forcible indecent act attorney requested the attorney's assistance in a situation where the client had been charged with a forcible indecent act and assault on the ground of having briefly grabbed a coworker's wrist.

CONTENTS
  • 1. The Client Who Sought Out the Forcible Indecent Act Attorney
    • - Background of the Case
  • 2. Forcible Indecent Act Attorney's Establishment of a Response Strategy
    • - Denial of Whether the Act Constituted an Indecent Act
    • - Denial of the Elements Establishing Assault
    • - Review of the Circumstances of the Complaint and the Credibility of the Statement
  • 3. Result of the Forcible Indecent Act Attorney's Response: "Non-Prosecution"
    • - Standards for Punishment of Forcible Indecent Acts and Assault
    • - Level of Punishment
    • - What if You Are Involved in Multiple Criminal Cases?

1. The Client Who Sought Out the Forcible Indecent Act Attorney

The forcible indecent act attorney obtained a non-prosecution decision in the case of an office worker charged with a forcible indecent act and assault for briefly grabbing a wrist while heading home after a drinking gathering, by establishing the nature of the act and the objectivity of the location.

Background of the Case

On the day of the incident, the client got up to head home after drinking with coworker A.

Afterward, when A asked for help, saying it was difficult to keep their balance, the client briefly held A's wrist.

However, A claimed regarding that situation that the client had grabbed A's wrist firmly and pulled A along against A's will, and filed a complaint for assault and a forcible indecent act.

In response, the client stated the position that "I never forcibly pulled or grabbed firmly; I merely held the wrist momentarily at the request," appealing to the unfairness of the situation and requesting the assistance of the forcible indecent act attorney.

Summary of the background of the forcible indecent act attorney's case

2. Forcible Indecent Act Attorney's Establishment of a Response Strategy

Details of the forcible indecent act attorney's establishment of a response strategy

The forcible indecent act attorney determined that the core issues of this case were whether briefly grabbing a wrist constitutes an indecent act under Article 298 of the Criminal Act, and whether it could be evaluated as an unlawful exercise of physical force as referred to in Article 260 of the Criminal Act.

Denial of Whether the Act Constituted an Indecent Act

The complainant claimed that a sexual intent was involved in the client's act of grabbing the complainant's wrist.

In response, the forcible indecent act attorney constructed a defense theory centered on the legal reasoning of Supreme Court Decision 2013Do7838.

Summary of Supreme Court Decision 2013Do7838

In determining whether an act constitutes an indecent act, the victim's intent, the relationship between the parties, the circumstances leading to the act, the specific nature of the act, and the objectivity of the location must be comprehensively considered

In light of such precedent, the attorney explained that, because the location where this incident occurred was an open bar, it was difficult to conclude that a sexual intent was involved based solely on a momentary touch of the wrist in such a space.

Denial of the Elements Establishing Assault

With respect to the assault charge, the forcible indecent act attorney selected and organized the key circumstances for determining whether assault is established, so that they could be referenced at the investigation stage.

The attorney constructed the opinion centered on whether the unlawful exercise of physical force and the coercion required under Article 260 of the Criminal Act actually existed.

▷ The fact that the client did not grab or pull the complainant's wrist firmly, and the contact was no more than a momentary and non-coercive level

▷ The fact that the location where the incident occurred was an open space freely accessible to an unspecified number of people, a situation in which force or coercion was difficult to exercise

▷ The fact that there was no objective evidence to suggest that any actual exercise of force or coercion against the other person's body had occurred

Review of the Circumstances of the Complaint and the Credibility of the Statement

The forcible indecent act attorney noted that this complaint was filed approximately one year after the date the incident occurred.

Considering as well that there was no third party who directly witnessed the situation at the time of the incident, it was necessary to review more strictly the accuracy of memory and the credibility of the statement with respect to a complaint made after a considerable period of time had elapsed.

Accordingly, the forcible indecent act attorney organized and submitted an opinion centered on the point that the complainant's statement, rather than reflecting the situation at the time as it was, could not be ruled out as having been exaggerated after the fact.

▷ The fact that the complaint was filed after a considerable period of time had elapsed following the incident

▷ The fact that there was no objective witness or corroborating evidence that could directly confirm the situation at the time

▷ The fact that reasonable doubt is raised as to the accuracy of memory and the credibility of the complainant's statement

3. Result of the Forcible Indecent Act Attorney's Response: "Non-Prosecution"

Non-prosecution decision as the result of the forcible indecent act attorney's assistance

As a result of the forcible indecent act attorney's assistance, the prosecution issued a non-prosecution decision

· The fact that there were no special circumstances in the suspect's act of grabbing the complainant's wrist that could be evaluated as a forcible indecent act

· The fact that there was insufficient objective evidence to recognize the intent to commit a forcible indecent act

· The fact that there was no third party who directly witnessed the situation at the time

· The fact that the complaint was filed only after approximately one year had elapsed following the incident

Standards for Punishment of Forcible Indecent Acts and Assault

What is the crime of forcible indecent act?

The crime of forcible indecent act refers to the crime of committing an indecent act against another person by means of the unlawful methods of assault or intimidation.


Here, an "indecent act" means physical contact that can provoke sexual shame or revulsion in an ordinary person and that constitutes a sexual act difficult to tolerate under generally accepted social norms.

In addition, the "assault or intimidation" referred to in the crime of forcible indecent act need only be sufficient to infringe on the other person's free right of sexual self-determination, and need not necessarily be of a level so strong that the other person cannot resist.


Therefore, even if the outward appearance of the act seems minor, depending on the circumstances or situation in which the act occurred, a light physical touch or the act of grabbing a wrist may also constitute a forcible indecent act.

What is the crime of assault?

Assault refers to the act of unlawfully exercising physical force against a person's body.


Here, assault does not necessarily require direct physical contact, and it may also include verbal abuse, insults, throwing objects, and other acts that approach the body and provoke fear or discomfort.

However, assault is a concept distinct from "bodily injury," which causes a disturbance to the physiological functions of the body, and it differs in that it addresses the exercise of a certain physical force itself.

Level of Punishment

The levels of punishment for a forcible indecent act and the crime of assault are as follows.

Type of Crime

Applicable Provision

Level of Punishment

Forcible indecent act

Article 298 of the Criminal Act

Imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine not exceeding 15 million won

Assault

Article 260 of the Criminal Act

Imprisonment for not more than 2 years or a fine not exceeding 5 million won

What if You Are Involved in Multiple Criminal Cases?

If, like the client in the case above, you are involved in a criminal case on multiple charges, you must respond strategically by distinguishing the issues for each charge from the early stage of the investigation.

Because the scope of the case and the likelihood of punishment can vary depending on the direction of the statements and the timing of the response, it is more important than anything else to examine the facts and legal principles precisely at the initial stage.

Daeryun Law Firm carefully reviews the client's statements and related materials to clearly distinguish the issues for each charge, and establishes a tailored response strategy suited to the nature of the case.

Through accompaniment to investigative interviews, guidance on statements, and the submission of opinions, the firm systematically conveys the facts and legal principles, and provides continuous follow-up assistance from the outset to the end so that the client does not experience unnecessary anxiety and burden.

If you have become involved in a criminal case under circumstances such as the above, please request our assistance through the 🔗Legal Consultation Reservation.

강제추행변호사 조력 사례 | 강제추행·폭행 혐의 의뢰인 불기소

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Related Information
Background

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's exclusive AI · IT
litigation strategies
Over 260
key members
1,200+ cases
handled monthly

* January 2026 Bar Association Transit Permit Issuance Criteria

*Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 Paragraph 1

Attorney
Legal consultation booking

All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.

Phone
consultation 1800-7905

Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

Phone booking

KakaoTalk
consultation

KakaoTalk channel

Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

KakaoTalk booking

Online
consultation

We provide tailored
legal services.

Online booking
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk