CONTENTS
- 1. The client who sought out a Mokpo narcotics attorney
- 2. The story of the Mokpo narcotics attorney's client
- - The punishment the Mokpo narcotics attorney's client could have received
- 3. A Mokpo narcotics attorney's defense of the client
- - A Mokpo narcotics attorney addresses the violation of the Narcotics Control Act
- - A Mokpo narcotics attorney addresses the assault and intimidation
- - A Mokpo narcotics attorney addresses the client's remorse
- 4. The decision obtained for the client by a Mokpo narcotics attorney
1. The client who sought out a Mokpo narcotics attorney
The client who sought out the Mokpo narcotics attorney requested assistance, stating that he had been accused in a criminal complaint of violation of the Narcotics Control Act, assault, and intimidation.
2. The story of the Mokpo narcotics attorney's client
The Mokpo narcotics attorney's client was the director of a local clinic, and the complainant was a staff member of the clinic's administrative office.
The complainant stated that the client, intending to administer the drugs himself even though there had been no actual examination, issued a prescription, purchased psychotropic drugs from a pharmacy pharmacist, and administered them.
The complainant also stated that while arguing with the complainant, the client threatened to kill him if he did not do as told and at the same time assaulted the complainant with objects within reach; the client requested a defense, stating that there were points he found unjust.
The punishment the Mokpo narcotics attorney's client could have received
The Mokpo narcotics attorney's client had three criminal charges applied and could have received the following punishment.
Narcotics Control Act Article 5 (Restriction on the Handling of Narcotics, etc.) ① A handler of narcotics shall not engage in any act prescribed in the subparagraphs of Article 4 (1) for any purpose other than that of his or her duties. Article 60 (Penalty Provisions) ① A person who falls under any of the following subparagraphs shall be punished by imprisonment with labor for not more than 10 years or by a fine not exceeding 100 million won. 4. A person who handles narcotics or issues a prescription therefor in violation of Article 5 (1) or (2), Article 9 (1), Article 28 (1), Article 30 (1), Article 35 (1), or Article 39 |
Criminal Act Article 260 (Assault, Assault against a Lineal Ascendant) ① A person who inflicts assault upon the body of another shall be punished by imprisonment with labor for not more than 2 years, a fine not exceeding 5 million won, detention, or a minor fine. |
Criminal Act Article 283 (Intimidation, Intimidation against a Lineal Ascendant) ① A person who intimidates another shall be punished by imprisonment with labor for not more than 3 years, a fine not exceeding 5 million won, detention, or a minor fine. |
The client faced the risk of being severely punished by imprisonment with labor for not more than 10 years or a fine not exceeding 100 million won.
3. A Mokpo narcotics attorney's defense of the client
The Mokpo narcotics attorney undertook the defense as follows in order to protect the client from punishment.
A Mokpo narcotics attorney addresses the violation of the Narcotics Control Act
Among the client's alleged offenses, the violation of the 🔗Narcotics Control Act will be examined first.
The client had been suffering severely from insomnia, which was due to his family.
As he was defrauded in an investment by a family member he had trusted and his economic loss became serious, he came to rely on sleeping pills, which led to this case.
A Mokpo narcotics attorney addresses the assault and intimidation
The staff member who filed the criminal complaint against the client was habitually negligent in his duties, and the number of patients noticeably decreased because of this staff member.
The client asked the staff member to resign, but the staff member held out, saying he did not wish to resign; their feelings toward each other worsened, and the frequency of their quarrels increased.
Angry and agitated at the staff member who spoke rudely to him, the client merely gestured at the staff member with an object that happened to be within sight; he did not commit assault.
In addition, he has never once in his life said he would kill anyone, so this appears to be a false claim by the complainant.
A Mokpo narcotics attorney addresses the client's remorse
While denying the offenses of assault and intimidation, the client sincerely regrets and reflects on the violation of the Narcotics Control Act.
The client is resolved, for the sake of his family, never again to commit such an unlawful act.
4. The decision obtained for the client by a Mokpo narcotics attorney
After hearing the Mokpo narcotics attorney, the police issued the client a “no-referral for no suspicion” decision.
As to the client's offenses, the police determined that there was insufficient evidence for the violation of the Narcotics Control Act and the assault, and that the offense of intimidation was not recognized,
Although it had seemed difficult for the client to avoid imprisonment with labor on account of three criminal charges, the Mokpo attorney defended against the punishment itself.
If you are in a situation like that of the client and need an attorney's assistance, please visit Daeryun Law Firm at any time.
Daeryun Law Firm will analyze the case thoroughly and propose an appropriate solution.
This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.
