Page title background (PC version)Page title background (mobile version)

Deals & Cases

Special (aggravated) intimidation

Intimidation Complaint Assistance | Non-Prosecution for a Client Accused of Special Intimidation

The client who came regarding the criminal complaint for intimidation had been charged by the other party on suspicion of the crime of special intimidation, and sought the assistance of a criminal attorney in order to respond to the case systematically.

CONTENTS
  • 1. The Client Who Sought Assistance with an Intimidation Complaint
    • - The Client Accused of Retaliatory Crime
  • 2. Retaliatory Crime Examined Through an Intimidation Complaint
    • - Penalties for Retaliatory Crime
  • 3. Case Response Strategy for an Intimidation Complaint
    • - Area of Assistance ① Asserting the Absence of Any Intent to Threaten the Victim
    • - Area of Assistance ② Asserting That No Further Threats Were Made
  • 4. Result of the Intimidation Complaint Assistance: “Non-Prosecution”
    • - If You Are Involved in a Retaliatory Crime and Need Help

1. The Client Who Sought Assistance with an Intimidation Complaint

Daeryun intimidation criminal complaint criminal case assistance case

This is a case in which a client who reached out regarding an intimidation criminal complaint came to face the risk of heavy punishment on a charge of special intimidation, but with the assistance of a criminal attorney concluded the case at an early stage with a non-prosecution decision.

The Client Accused of Retaliatory Crime

The detailed account of the client who came to us regarding an intimidation complaint is as follows.

The client was returning home by vehicle after work.

Then, at the moment a vehicle in the lane next to the client changed lanes, a sound of impact occurred.

The client, judging that the other vehicle had collided with his own vehicle, chased after that vehicle.

However, the other vehicle misunderstood that the client was following for the purpose of retaliation, and on that basis filed a complaint for 🔗retaliatory driving/reckless driving.

Although the client had no such intention at all, he was placed at risk of punishment and was feeling great anxiety.

He came to a criminal defense attorney in order to respond systematically at the early stage of the case together with a specialized attorney and to successfully defend against punishment.

2. Retaliatory Crime Examined Through an Intimidation Complaint

The client, who had been the subject of a complaint on a charge of special (aggravated) intimidation, wished to succeed in defending against punishment.

Let us examine the penalty range for special (aggravated) intimidation in detail.

Penalties for Retaliatory Crime

Retaliatory driving goes beyond a mere unlawful act and is a crime that uses a vehicle, a dangerous means, so various charges apply.

It is regarded as a more serious crime than an ordinary tort under the Criminal Act, and more severe criminal punishment is imposed.

The levels of punishment for retaliatory crimes are as shown in the table below.

Levels of punishment for retaliatory crimes

Special (aggravated) bodily injury

Imprisonment for not less than 1 year and not more than 10 years

Special destruction of property

Imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not more than 10 million won

Special (aggravated) assault

Imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not more than 10 million won

Special (aggravated) intimidation

Imprisonment for not more than 7 years or a fine of not more than 10 million won

3. Case Response Strategy for an Intimidation Complaint

Daeryun intimidation complaint, special assault, non-prosecution case study

The criminal attorney closely analyzed the case and established a systematic strategy.

To succeed in defending against punishment in the intimidation complaint case, the attorney argued as follows.

Issues in the Case

1. Did the client have an intent to threaten the victim?
2. Did the client inflict harm sufficient to instill fear in the other party?

Area of Assistance ① Asserting the Absence of Any Intent to Threaten the Victim

Because the other vehicle took no measures even though there was the sound of a vehicle collision, the client mistakenly believed it to be a hit-and-run drunk driving incident.

The client therefore attempted to block and stop the victim's vehicle within the least dangerous limits possible.

Accordingly, the attorney emphasized that this was merely an action based on the client's mistaken belief and that no intent to threaten existed.

Area of Assistance ② Asserting That No Further Threats Were Made

The client had not braked so suddenly that the victim would have been unable to avoid it.

In addition, the client did not inflict any further threat, such as repeatedly honking the horn or getting out of the vehicle to hurl abusive language.

The attorney emphasized that this did not amount to the "harm sufficient to cause fear in the other party" referred to in the precedents.

4. Result of the Intimidation Complaint Assistance: “Non-Prosecution”

The prosecution, accepting the criminal attorney's argument, ultimately decided on "non-prosecution" .

The client, who obtained the non-prosecution decision through the systematic assistance of a professional attorney, expressed deep gratitude.

If You Are Involved in a Retaliatory Crime and Need Help

Retaliatory driving is not a mere traffic violation but a serious crime that may be punished as special intimidation or special assault under the Criminal Act, and it can even lead to an actual custodial sentence.

It can be advantageous to respond together with a criminal defense attorney throughout the entire process, from the initial statement, to the response to evidence, to the preparation of sentencing materials, in order to minimize legal disadvantages.

At Daeryun, 🔗criminal defense attorneys with abundant practical experience and expertise promptly assess the scale and type of the client's case and respond by establishing a strategy.

If you need the assistance of a specialist attorney in a situation similar to the case above, please entrust your case to us through a 🔗legal consultation reservation.

Watch related video content
for this case study.

  1. Retaliatory driving is subject to criminal punishment even just once.

협박죄고소 조력 | 특수협박죄 고소당한 의뢰인, 불기소

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Related Information
Background

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's exclusive AI · IT
litigation strategies
Over 240
key members
1,200+ cases
handled monthly

* January 2026 Bar Association Transit Permit Issuance Criteria

*Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 Paragraph 1

Attorney
Legal consultation booking

All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.

Phone
consultation 1800-7905

Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

Phone booking

KakaoTalk
consultation

KakaoTalk channel

Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

KakaoTalk booking

Online
consultation

We provide tailored
legal services.

Online booking
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk