Gyodae criminal attorney's assistance | Gyodae attorney recommendation, defending a client charged with arson of one's own general property against an actual sentence, resulting in a suspended sentence

The client in this case went to a park one day when a strong wind was blowing.

Out of a small curiosity about 🔗arson, the client took out a lighter.

At first the client set fire only to a few strands of straw, but, unable to restrain the impulse, set fire with the lighter to a pile of straw in the park's flower bed.

The arson in this case burned the bases of 2 trees, and the spreading fire destroyed a flower bed of about 10 pyeong.

The client destroyed their own property in a park used by an unspecified number of people, thereby creating a public danger.

Had the fire not been extinguished by the firefighters dispatched to the scene, it could have spread to nearby apartments and officetels and created a public danger.

The client came to the Gyodae criminal attorney in order to reduce the sentence as much as possible with the help of a specialist attorney.

The client has no particular physical ailment, but has received mental health treatment since childhood.

From the fourth grade of elementary school, the client was distracted during class and could not concentrate.

As a result of visiting a hospital after experiencing such symptoms, the client was diagnosed with ADHD.

Accordingly, the attorney emphasized that this offense was not a planned offense but an impulsive offense stemming from a mental illness.

The client has, belatedly, come to realize how blameworthy a crime their conduct was and is reflecting on it.

The attorney emphasized that, although no actual harm occurred, the client is deeply repentant that innocent citizens could have suffered great harm because of the client's offense.

Fortunately, the flames spread only to the trees in the flower bed and the fire was extinguished before long, so no greater harm occurred.

Because the flames did not spread fiercely or catch onto other flammable objects, no casualties occurred at all.

In addition, the attorney emphasized that the property damage was limited to scorching of the flower bed and the complete burning of the trees, a level that the client's family was fully able to compensate.