Press Coverage

Daeryun Law Firm (Liuhan) recruits former Chief Judge Kwak Min-seop... “Corporate Advisory Specialization”Daeryun Law Firm (Lihan), which represents intellectual property rights litigation and provides corporate consulting services, announced on the 29th that it has hired attorney Min-seop Kwak, a former chief judge. Attorney Min-seop Kwak was appointed as a judge at the Gwangju District Court in 1996, and served as a judge at the Patent Court and as chief judge and chief judge of the Haenam branch of the Gwangju District Court. In particular, he has served as a judge at the Patent Court for a long time and is currently a lawyer specializing in the field of intellectual property rights. He is handling numerous patent lawsuits, including patent invalidation lawsuits and patent infringement lawsuits, and is in charge of representing and advising companies in intellectual property lawsuits related to trademark rights, design rights, etc. While serving as chief judge and district attorney, he has experience handling many major crimes such as violation of the Public Official Election Act, sexual crimes against children and adolescents, arson and murder, and embezzlement cases. Attorney Kwak said, "I am happy to join Daeryun, Korea's 10th largest law firm," and added, "I will use my experience as a chief judge to contribute to the growth of Daeryun so that it can stand tall in specialized fields such as sexual crimes and intellectual property rights." CEO Kook-il Kim said, “As the demand for corporate advice related to intellectual property rights increases, we expect that the recruitment of Attorney Kwak will enable us to become a law firm specializing in corporate legal affairs encompassing all fields.” He added, “Daeryun will do our best to provide the same high-quality legal services nationwide by recruiting a large number of lawyers with backgrounds in judges and prosecutors.” Meanwhile, since its establishment in 2018, Daeryun Law Firm (Lihan) is a law firm with the largest number of offices in Korea and has grown into one of the top 10 large law firms in Korea. The case is overseen by judges, district chiefs, prosecutors, and lawyers with experience working as police officers, and is comprised of a team of more than 500 experts. [View full article] Money Today - Daeryun Law Firm (Lihan) recruits former Chief Judge Kwak Min-seop... “Corporate Advisory Specialization” Ro Issue - Daeryun Law Firm (Liuhan) Recruits Former Chief Judge Kwak Min-seop

Attorney Won-il Won, a former judge at the Seoul Central District Court... Experience as head of POSCO Holdings’ legal department dedicated to civil litigation and criminal cases… Daeryun Won Hyung-il, who has built up expertise by handling corporate legal cases, said, "Based on the know-how accumulated in my current position, Daeryun and I will enter the second golden age." Daeryun CEO Kim Kuk-il said, "We will be able to respond strategically to disputes between companies." Daeryun Law Firm (Limited) announced on the 26th that it has hired lawyer Won Won-il, a former judge. After being appointed as a judge at the Seoul Central District Court, Attorney Won served as a judge at the Seoul Northern District Court and the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court. During his tenure as a judge, Attorney Won mainly handled civil litigation and criminal cases. Based on this experience, Attorney Won served as managing director and head of the legal office at POSCO Holdings and as director (executive director) of the legal office at POSCO Future M, where he was in charge of compliance support, fair trade compliance manager, and overall management of the fair trade voluntary compliance program. Since then, whenever there is a need to make an overseas investment, he has accumulated expertise by handling numerous corporate legal cases, including analyzing local laws in advance and checking and responding to violations of the Fair Trade Act in relation to transactions with group affiliates. Attorney Won is expected to play a pivotal role in corporate litigation and disputes based on his experience in reviewing and responding to legal risks related to international trade and the Fair Trade Act between companies. Attorney Won said, “My experience in handling civil and criminal cases will be of great help in handling cases in the future,” and expressed his ambition, “Based on the know-how I have accumulated in my current position, I want to enter the second heyday with Daeryun.” CEO Kook-il Kim said, “With the recruitment of lawyer Won, who specializes in the field of corporate law, we will be able to take strategic action in responding to disputes between companies,” and added, “Daeryun will continue to recruit professional lawyers specialized in each field to expand our expertise.” Daeryun Law Firm (Limited) is a law firm that operates the largest number of offices in the country since its establishment in 2018. Currently, Daeryun has 20 judges, prosecutors, and former police lawyers serving as members.  [View full article] Daily - Daeryun Law Firm recruits former judge Won Il Won, a 'specialist in corporate law' Bucheon e-News - Daeryun Law Firm (Limited) recruits former judge Won Won Il

Last year, drug driving license was revoked. 82case…2019than years 41% There are likely to be more actual cases of drug driving due to lack of increased crackdown regulations. Simple drug driving punishment., Weaker than drunk driving  [Daily Good News] Reporter Park Sang-woo = Driving while under the influence of drugs ‘drug driving’Although this is increasing, it is pointed out that there is an urgent need to prepare countermeasures due to insufficient crackdown and punishment regulations.. According to the National Police Agency, it occurred after taking drugs. 2car crime ▲2020year 182case ▲20221year 230case ▲2022year 214It amounts to.Among these, traffic crimes ▲2020year 45case ▲2021year 67case ▲2022year 66Counted as a case. What happens after taking drugs 2car crime 4In the middle of the case 1This is a traffic crime.. There is also a case where a driver's license was revoked due to drug use. 2019year 58In the gun 2023year(110month) 82By the matter 41% There was a sharp increase. This increase in drug driving is due to the increase in drug offenders.. According to prosecutors 2018year 1only2,613The number of crackdowns on drug offenders was 2022year 1only8,395By the matter 45.8% increased. The problem is that crackdown and punishment regulations for drug driving are insufficient..According to research results from the University of Iowa, the antihistamine ingredient ‘diphenhydramine’Driving after taking drugs containing these drugs is due to high blood alcohol content. 0.1% It can lead to more dangerous situations than drunk driving.. blood alcohol concentration 0.1%Driver's license revocation department 1more than a year 2Imprisonment of less than one year 500More than 10,000 won 1,000Punishable by a fine of less than 10,000 won.According to another study, drug addicted patients who suffer from serious psychomotor disorders due to drug dependence have lower blood alcohol levels. 1.73.0% Shows effects and symptoms corresponding to the above.Here, drug users tend to engage in their own specific behaviors after taking drugs..Korean detective‧Kim Nang-hee, a research fellow at the Korea Legal Policy Institute, “One of the characteristics of drug users is that they exhibit behavioral patterns that must be followed after taking drugs.”as “For example, go into a corner of the room, turn on music and stay still., There are many types of people who must drive, etc., but these people can be more dangerous.”explained.However, there are currently no provisions to crack down on drug driving, so drug tests can only be conducted in special situations where alcohol intake cannot be measured even if the driver speaks gibberish or exhibits abnormal behavior.. As a result, the police often do not crack down on drugs under the pretext of not having crackdown regulations, so drug use is often not detected.. For this reason, it is estimated that the actual number of drug driving cases is much higher than the number of cases cracked down by the police.. According to the current Road Traffic Act, drug driving 3Imprisonment of up to one year or 1,000Punishable by a fine of less than 10,000 won. This is blood alcohol concentration 0.2% Drunk driving or more 2more than a year 5Imprisonment of up to one year or 1,000More than 10,000 won 2,000It is only half of a fine of less than 10,000 won..In particular, there is a provision for punishment for drug driving in the Act on Aggravated Punishment for Specific Crimes, but this applies only if it results in a fatal accident.. In other words, the punishment for simple drug driving is actually weaker than that for drunk driving..For example, last 2021A driver who caused a serial collision and left the scene while driving after taking psychotropic drugs in Suwon, Gyeonggi-do was sentenced to prison in 2012. 1probation for 1 year 2Sentenced to years. After this 2022year 4Sentence for drug driving in February ‘3Imprisonment of less than one year 1,000A fine of less than 10,000 won’at ‘5Imprisonment of less than one year 2,000A fine of less than 10,000 won’An amendment to the Road Traffic Act was proposed to strengthen the.Last year, if you cause injury due to drugged driving, 2more than a year 15Imprisonment of up to one year or 3,000More than 10,000 won 5,000A fine of less than 10,000 won, If death is caused by a weapon or 5Amendments to punishing imprisonment for more than one year, Measures the degree of drug influence of drivers suspected of driving under the influence of drugs, and standards and measurement methods for driving is prohibited., procedures, etc. 'presidential decree'An amendment was proposed that aims to stipulate that.However, these bills last year 12month 9closed to work 21It was not submitted to the last regular session of the Grand National Assembly.. Currently, the National Assembly is holding an extraordinary session and discussing pending bills.. coming 25work and next month 1If the bill is not processed at the plenary session held on the 22The Grand National Assembly may have to start from square one..Experts point out that drug driving crackdowns and punishment regulations must be strengthened as soon as possible..A legal expert who requested anonymity said: “Just as there is a perception that drunk driving will be cracked down on, we need to raise awareness by establishing crackdown standards for drug driving.”as “We need to introduce regulations that allow for simultaneous testing for drinking and drug use, as well as standards for punishment based on the level of use, similar to drunk driving.”advised.Some point out that it is also necessary to strengthen the capabilities of front-line police departments to crack down on drug driving..Dongjin Kim, attorney at Daeryun Law Firm, "To the local district headquarters or police station traffic investigation team (To crack down on drug driving) Drug diagnosis kits are not well-equipped and drug testing is not compulsory, making it difficult to carry out body hair collection."as "It is necessary to establish a drug investigation team at the police station and strengthen the drug driving crackdown capabilities of front-line police stations through the distribution and training of drug diagnostic kits."advised.  [View full article] - Drug driving is on the rise...crackdown‧Punishment regulations are insufficient

Daeryun Law Firm (Lihan), which specializes in crimes in the areas of corruption, economics, and criminal affairs, announced that it recently hired attorney Seo Bong-ha, a former chief prosecutor.  Attorney Seo Bong-ha was appointed as a prosecutor at the Jeju District Prosecutors' Office in 2002, and served as a prosecutor at the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office, Cheongju District Prosecutors' Office, Bucheon Branch of Incheon District Prosecutors' Office, Seoul Northern District Prosecutors' Office, and Jeonju District Prosecutors' Office. Afterwards, he served as a researcher at the Supreme Prosecutors' Office Inspection Headquarters and conducted investigations into various irregularities. After serving as the deputy chief prosecutor of the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office, Western Branch, he served as the head of the Uijeongbu District Prosecutors' Trial and Litigation Department and the chief prosecutor of the 3rd Criminal Division of the Busan District Prosecutors' Office, Western Branch. While serving as a prosecutor, he handled many cases, including embezzlement, breach of trust, violent murder, and bribery. Currently, he is active in the criminal field, including sexual crimes, fair trade, and economic crimes. Attorney Seo said, “As Daeryun is focusing on increasing the success rate through cooperation and communication between lawyers, future growth is expected. I am happy to join Daeryun, which has endless growth potential,” and added, “Based on the experience I have accumulated in the field, I will raise Daeryun’s status in the criminal field.” CEO Kim Kuk-il said, “Daeryun is continuously recruiting lawyers who have been active in the field as judges and prosecutors,” and added, “In order to provide the same high-quality legal services across the country, we will continue to recruit experts and improve services.” Meanwhile, Daeryun Law Firm (Liuhan) is a law firm that operates the largest office in Korea since its establishment in 2018, and has grown into the 10th largest law firm in Korea. Currently, a number of judges, district chiefs, prosecutors, and police lawyers are serving as members, and are overseeing the cases accepted. [View full article] - Daeryun Law Firm (Limited) Recruits Former Chief Prosecutor Seo Bong-ha

Surgery due to sequelae of pulmonary embolism after ankle fracture surgery 9died in 1 day“Even if you explained it well”‥bereaved family, Claim for damages for violation of duty of caution and explanation  “My son, who was healthy, passed away due to the aftereffects of what was said to be a simple ankle fracture surgery.. But none of the medical staff apologized., I am not responsible. It is even more unfair and heartbreaking to think that the aftereffects could have been prevented.. To appease my son's resentment, We would like to hold those who do not apologize legally accountable..”The deceased's father, who left his son Kim Dong-ho devastated due to pulmonary embolism as a side effect of the surgery after undergoing surgery for an ankle fracture, filed a lawsuit. 1He made this appeal ahead of the second hearing date..Solidarity for Prohibition of Discrimination against Disabled Persons(Hereinafter, Jangchuryeon)and People First Seoul Center 12work morning 10city 30In front of the Bucheon branch of the Incheon District Court, a suit for damages was filed in the case of death after surgery of Mr. Kim Dong-ho, a developmentally disabled person. 1The second hearing date is approximately 30A press conference was held minutes beforehand..According to Jang Chu-ryeon, the past 2022year 7In May, Dong-ho Kim, a developmentally disabled person, suffered a fractured left ankle after falling on his way to work and underwent surgical surgery.. AOriental medicine hospital is used for nursing care after surgery at the hospital. BHe was taken to the hospital, but after surgery he 9died within days.Autopsy results showed that the cause of death was pulmonary embolism, a sequela of surgery.. The bereaved family claimed that there were various problems that led to Dong-ho's death, such as not properly communicating the post-surgery progress and not properly confirming the person's situation because he was developmentally disabled..“Dongho, who was healthy and had many dreams, left us without notice, like a lie, after undergoing surgery for an ankle fracture that was said to be simple.. Our family is living in an unbelievably devastated reality, immersed in indescribable sadness.. When I think of that time, I regret it so much, and when I think of my son, I feel so sorry..”“Even though my son passed away like that, no one apologizes or takes responsibility and just tries to avoid it.. If Dong-ho had explained the precursor symptoms of pulmonary embolism in detail to himself and his family and had been actively tested or treated, would Dong-ho have gone to heaven in vain?. It's even more unfortunate and unfair to think that prevention might not have been possible..”(Father of the deceased Kim Dong-ho)As a result, the bereaved families “I would like to hold those who did not even apologize for my son's death legally accountable.”as 2023year 7month 26Day Ahospital department BA lawsuit was filed against the hospital for damages due to medical negligence that violated the duty of care and duty of explanation for Mr. Kim Dong-ho, a developmentally disabled person..Lawyer Choi Bo-yoon of Daeryun Law Firm, the legal representative in this case, “The medical staff's explanation is a precautionary measure that is the medical staff's duty of care in subsequent treatment., It is an important starting point that leads to follow-up observation and emergency treatment. In particular, pulmonary embolism can lead to death if the possibility or fact of occurrence is not detected quickly, so explanation of this is very important.”He emphasized.Even in the Supreme Court precedent ‘If the occurrence or possibility of pulmonary embolism was not detected quickly and prompt diagnosis and emergency treatment were missed., Medical negligence is acknowledged’It is ruled that.However, surgical operation and hospitalization were performed on Mr. Kim Dong-ho. Atransferred to the hospital and later BDiagnosis of pulmonary embolism that could have occurred in the deceased or their family at any hospital, Symptoms typically expected to occur, It is a clear violation of medical law because there was no explanation of what the patient must follow to prevent serious consequences..Attorney Choi “Ahospital department BThe hospital medical staff also admits that they did not explain the pulmonary embolism.. But when they entered into a lawsuit ‘I didn't know because I wasn't coughing when I was making rounds.’and avoid it ‘After all, it was the nurse handover time.’It is claimed that”and pinched.Not only that ‘I didn't know much about my disability because my guardian didn't tell me about it.’He claimed that the bereaved family was responsible because the bereaved family did not inform them of Kim Dong-ho's disability status..However, Dong-ho's intellectual disability and the extent of his condition are revealed in his use of language and manner of speaking, to the extent that he was diagnosed with severe intellectual disability among developmental disabilities.. Accordingly, Daeryun Law Firm released a video of his activities during his lifetime., Transcripts, etc. were submitted as evidence..Lawyer Bo-Yoon Choi “The Medical Service Act does not provide for cases where decision-making capacity is lacking, but disabled people should not be discriminated against under the Disability Discrimination Prohibition Act.”as “Medical staff must actively provide appropriate explanations and medical treatment according to the patient's disability.”He said.In particular, the Supreme Court ruled that medical staff should, degree of education, Specific information must be provided according to circumstances such as mental and physical condition, etc., The explanation is that it has been ruled that there is an obligation to prepare for after-effects by explaining in detail the methods of treatment and other matters necessary for health management so that the patient can independently determine and respond to the necessary measures to prevent serious consequences according to the patient's circumstances..mudfish “The defendant hospitals' claims, which appear to avoid making appropriate judgments about patients and vaguely pass on responsibility for failing to provide more detailed information to their guardians, are a violation of the Anti-Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities Act and are also against the Medical Service Act and related precedents.”claimed that.finally “I hope that this incident will become a precedent for all disabled people, including those with developmental disabilities, to receive appropriate treatment without discrimination.”While “We hope that the national and local government medical systems will also improve so that all citizens can receive the best medical services.”He said emphatically.  [View full article] Able News - Unjust death of developmentally disabled person due to medical accident “Please tell the court to reveal the truth”daily game - Family of developmentally disabled person who dies after ankle fracture surgery "Please let go of my injustice"The Indigo - “Even if the hospital was explained well…” Controversy over death after ankle fracture surgery for developmentally disabled person

[Sports Seoul | [Reporter Kim Soo-gi] Daeryun Law Firm (Limited) announced on the 11th that it has signed an MOU for business cooperation with Megastudy Group. At the agreement ceremony held at Megastudy Group's headquarters in Seocho-gu, Seoul on the 10th, Daeryun Law Firm (Limited) CEO Kook-il Kim, Chief General Counsel Park Seong-dong, and Megastudy Group Chairman Joo-eun Son attended. Pursuant to the agreement, both organizations provided △Education legal advice to Megastudy Group. We plan to cooperate in △supporting legal counseling for members △exchanging information necessary for mutual exchange △promoting seminars and education for joint projects. In particular, Daeryun plans to actively respond to cybercrimes by utilizing the capabilities of the criminal case team, evidence investigation, and digital forensics center. Chairman Joo-eun Son said, “In situations that require multifaceted legal advice such as internal and external compliance, contract document review, and criminal response, “I believe that Daeryun will be a great help to Megastudy with its abundant advisory experience,” he said. “Based on Daeryun’s professional legal advice, we will become number one in the field of college entrance exam education.” CEO Kuk-il Kim said, “Daeryun has advisory capabilities in each field to the extent that it operates a criminal investigation center, corporate legal center, and school violence center,” and added, “We will support a rapid response to the increase in crimes such as cyber infringement accidents and cyber violence, and Daeryun’s help will help.” “We will work faithfully in all areas where necessary.” [View full article] Sports Seoul - Daeryun Law Firm signs MOU with Megastudy Group Dongyang Ilbo - Daeryun·Megastudy Group, MOU

Daeryun Law Firm announced on the 1st that it signed a business agreement for legal advice in the medical field with Wills Memorial Hospital of the Thomas Medical Foundation, a medical corporation, on the 29th. Attending the agreement ceremony on this day were Kim Kuk-il, Daeryun's representative attorney, and Park Chun-geun, chairman of the board and medical director of Wills Memorial Hospital. Wills Memorial Hospital, located in Suwon, Gyeonggi Province, has been designated as a spine specialty hospital by the Ministry of Health and Welfare four times in a row. Daeryun plans to cooperate with Wills Memorial Hospital in the future to provide legal advice, information exchange, seminars, and training in the medical and health fields. This law firm, which has recently been increasing the size of its medical team, plans to further strengthen its competitiveness in the medical field through this business agreement. Representative attorney Kim said, “Based on the legal advisory know-how of the medical team that we have accumulated over the years, we will provide legal services befitting the status of Wills Memorial Hospital.”   [View full article] - Daeryun, medical legal advice MOU with Wills Memorial Hospital

Daeryun Law Firm (Lihan) announced on the 21st that it signed a medical legal advisory business agreement with Dongsuwon Hospital of Noksan Medical Foundation, a medical corporation, on the 20th. The agreement ceremony was attended by officials including Noksan Medical Foundation Chairman Byun Young-hoon and Daeryun Law Firm (Limited) CEO Kim Kuk-il. Through this business agreement, we decided to cooperate with each other in △ legal advice on medical and public health issues △ legal review of contracts △ legal consultation support for medical corporation executives and employees △ information sharing through mutual exchanges △ promotion of seminars and training for joint projects. Daeryun Law Firm (Lihan) plans to provide legal advice and litigation representation in the civil, administrative, criminal, and contract areas, focusing on a medical team. CEO Kook-il Kim said, “Through this agreement, we hope to form a mutually sustainable and developmental relationship through improved medical services and the best legal advice,” and added, “We will do our best to achieve sustainable development by generously utilizing the capabilities and human resources that the law firm possesses.” Chairman Byun Young-hoon said, "There are many situations in which legal advice is needed for hospital operation. We expect that with Daeryun's cooperation, we will be able to provide more systematic and reliable medical services." Meanwhile, Daeryun Law Firm (Lihan) is the 10th largest law firm in Korea and operates 22 specialized centers including medical, criminal, and corporate law. It has 35 offices nationwide.   [View full article] - Daeryun-Dongsuwon Hospital, Law Firm (Limited), signs MOU for medical legal advice

We decided to cooperate with each other through legal advice, legal seminars, etc. Goal of minimizing on-site risk Daeryun Law Firm (Lihan) announced on the 22nd that it signed a business agreement (MOU) for initial response to major disasters with Hadong Bit Dream Headquarters of Korea Southern Power Co., Ltd. on the 21st. The agreement ceremony was attended by officials including Song Ki-in, head of the Hadong Bit Dream Headquarters of Korea Southern Power Company, and Kim Kuk-il, chief general counsel of Daeryun Law Firm (Law Firm). They agreed to cooperate in △ legal advice on first response to serious disasters △ promotion of legal education and seminars related to serious disasters △ information sharing through mutual exchanges △ lectures on the Punishment Act for Severe Accidents, etc. Existing workplaces with 50 or more employees and construction amount The Serious Accident Punishment Act, which was applied only to businesses with an income of 5 billion won or more, will also apply to all workplaces with 5 or more employees and businesses with an income of less than 5 billion won from January 27, 2024. Prior to expanding the scope of application, the two organizations plan to minimize on-site confusion through active exchange. In particular, we prevent safety and health-related incidents that may occur to workers while performing work and provide legal advice to quickly resolve problems. Through this, we plan to minimize risks. Song Ki-in, head of the Hadong Bit Dream Headquarters of Southern Power Corporation, said, "Initial response and response are the most important in major disasters. As we need advice on not only initial response to major disasters but also other legal issues, we thought Daeryun Law Firm (Liuhan), which has expertise in various fields, was suitable. We expect to be able to smoothly cooperate and actively exchange with each other in providing advice and education." Kim Kuk-il, CEO of Daeryun Law Firm (Limited), said, "Initial response to a major disaster requires a lawyer with expertise to be by your side, obtain advice on a regular basis, and create a situation in which you can respond immediately. Daeryun has many lawyers from the field and companies. We will provide generous support of human resources to minimize the risks related to major disasters and create a safe site." Meanwhile, Daeryun Law Firm (Lihan) is ranked 10th in Korea. It is a large law firm that operates 22 specialized centers, including labor/industrial accident, construction/real estate, and corporate law.   [View full article] - Daeryun Law Firm (Limited), MOU for initial response to major disasters with Korea Southern Power Company's Hadong Bit Dream Headquarters

The Supreme Court appears to be reducing the number of complaints related to inter-floor noise following the precedent of confirming stalking punishment for acts of retaliation. Punishment of ‘those who cause inter-floor noise’ is a blind spot. Recently, with the Supreme Court’s first ruling that retaliatory acts against inter-floor noise can be punished as ‘stalking,’ it is expected that a series of criminal complaints related to inter-floor noise will follow. On the 14th, the Supreme Court sentenced a man in his 30s to eight months in prison and two years of probation for harassing his neighbors by intentionally causing noise in the house above him during a dispute over noise between floors. This is the first ruling by the Supreme Court that recognizes retaliation for noise between floors as a stalking crime. According to the Supreme Court precedent, there are concerns that the number of cases in which retaliation for noise between floors will be filed as stalking will increase compared to now. This is because with the enforcement of the Stalking Punishment Act in October 2021, inter-floor noise retaliation meets the conditions for stalking. Cho Seong-geun, an attorney at Daeryun Law Firm, explained, “When establishing the stalking punishment law, noise between floors would not have been taken into consideration. The purpose of the legislation at the time would have been to deter sending messages and voices to unwanted parties, but it ended up fitting into the act of retaliation against noise between floors.” The problem is that although the path to punishment for inter-floor noise retaliation has been opened, there is no proper means of holding accountable those who caused inter-floor noise. Attorney Cho explained, “Generally, it is difficult to file a criminal complaint for causing noise between floors,” and “You can only report a violation of the Stalking Punishment Act if the intention to intentionally cause noise to reach the house below is proven.” Inter-floor noise disputes are increasing day by day. According to the office of Democratic Party lawmaker Hong Ki-won, complaints about inter-floor noise in apartment complexes increased by about 70% from 32,785 in 2019 to 55,504 in 2022. As inter-floor noise disputes become more frequent, measures to strengthen the responsibility of those causing inter-floor noise are being demanded. Cha Sang-gon, director of the Housing Culture and Housing Improvement Research Institute, pointed out, “There is nothing that can be done from the perspective of victims of inter-floor noise,” adding, “We do not support retaliation, but the problem is that there is no appropriate means to punish the cause.”   [View full article] - “Revenge of noise between floors? Try it somewhere”… I'm going to get caught one after another for stalking.