Press Coverage

As times change and children become more independent, the number of people deciding to stand on their own is increasing. Three out of 10 divorced couples are in the category of divorce at twilight. Divorce at dusk shows different aspects from divorce at the beginning of marriage, the so-called ‘divorce at dawn’. As children become adults, child support is no longer dealt with, and there are relatively few cases where there are disputes over alimony as the statute of limitations on damages claims has expired. Therefore, the dispute that accounts for the largest proportion of divorce at twilight is property division. Property division is the act of dividing the property accumulated by a couple through joint cooperation during the marriage period according to each person's contribution. In the generation preparing for divorce in their twilight years, conflicts arise regarding 'homemaker property division' because dual-income families are not common. However, child rearing and housework also constitute indirect property formation, so even those who have been housewives throughout the marriage can claim property division. Division of not only cash but also bonds and real rights such as cars and apartments is recognized. Divorce lawyer Lee Seon Choi said, "When determining contribution to the formation of common property, the entire marital life is comprehensively considered. Since only income-generating activities are not considered as contributions to the formation of property, housewives can also request property division in divorce at dusk. However, it is important to prove contribution." “There is a case where ownership of half of an apartment was recognized,” he said. “This is a result achieved through specific proof of cooperation during the marriage period.” Help = Lee Seon Choi, attorney at Daeryun Law Firm (Limited) | [View full article] - In the event of a divorce at dusk, a housewife can also file a claim for division of assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars and jointly name the apartment.

[Busan = Newsis] Reporter Kwon Tae-wan = A woman in her 40s who forged a parking sign for a disabled parking space was sentenced to probation. According to the legal community on the 5th, Criminal Division 5 of the Eastern Branch of the Busan District Court (Judge Kyung-hoon Moon) sentenced Ms. A (40s, female), who was indicted on charges of forging official documents and using forged official documents, to four months in prison and two years of probation. The court also sentenced Ms. A to 80 hours of probation. Community service was ordered. According to the criminal facts acknowledged by the first trial, Mr. A is accused of forging an image of a 'disabled parking space parking space sign' after downloading it from the Internet in order to park in a disabled parking space at his residence in Busan last year. Mr. A is also accused of placing a forged disabled parking space parking sign at the bottom of the driver's side windshield of his vehicle in the parking lot of a department store in Haeundae-gu, Busan on February 18 of this year. It is said that a citizen who saw a parking sign for a disabled parking space filed a complaint. If you forge a parking sign for a disabled parking space, you can be severely punished, including up to 7 years in prison or a fine of up to 20 million won. Kim Dong-jin, a lawyer at Daeryun Law Firm (Limited), said, "Forgery of official documents and use of forged official documents are crimes that lower public trust in society, so they are severely punished," and "Citizens are different from before. He explained, “Courts are also not putting up with crimes like falsifying official documents like they used to, and there is a trend of strengthening the level of punishment.” He added, “Although the duration of the crime in this case is not long or the severity of the crime is serious, the court is imposing a severe punishment by imposing a suspended sentence, and that shows that our society is paying a lot of attention to protecting the disabled.”   [View full article] - Woman in her 40s sentenced to probation for forging and using parking signs in disabled parking spaces

【 Anchor Comment 】We are planning to go beyond gender equality and now move towards gender inclusion as part of our year-round plan. However, if women are always anxious because they are not safe from sexual crimes, they will not be able to live a basic life, beyond equality between men and women. Recently, the crime of forcible home invasion and molestation was judged unconstitutional due to excessively harsh punishment, creating a legislative vacuum. As a result, victims and victims of lawsuits are feeling anxious. Moreover, the number of women living alone is increasing. There are many who point out that legislation is urgent because of the situation. This is Reporter Choi Hee-ji. [Reporter] A man who was loitering in front of the room called a lodging employee with a master key and naturally opened the door and entered. A woman in her 20s was sleeping alone in the room, and the man committed indecent assault by forcibly removing her clothes. Mr. A, the victim of the incident, is still filled with fear when he thinks about the incident that day. ▶ Interview: Mr. A / Forced home invasion and molestation Victim - "Because she was forcibly molested in a safe space, from a woman's perspective, she cannot feel safe in any space..." After more than a year of investigation and trial, she was about to be sentenced, but last month, the Constitutional Court ruled that the 'forcible molestation crime of home invasion' was unconstitutional, so she had to wait for another trial. Even if the sentence was commuted, at least three years in prison was expected, but with the disappearance of the law, the possibility of being released on probation has increased. ▶ Interview: Mr. A / Home invasion Victim of forcible molestation - "I was scared because I knew I could get probation (since it was my first offense) and I thought there was a possibility of retaliation..." Currently, there are more than 3 million single-woman households in Korea, and the crime they fear most is home invasion. Women who have been victims of sexual crimes complain of pain, saying they cannot feel safe even in their own space. A lawyer who represents female victims of forcible molestation and attempted rape hears the most that the child was also assaulted at home. It is even more difficult.▶ Interview: Jo Seong-geun / Attorney specializing in sexual violence - "Some extreme choices are made because the victims (whom I represent) have to live in fear in their residences where they spend nearly half of their day..." A Ministry of Justice official said, "We are reviewing specific content or plans," but there has been no discussion of specific follow-up legislation to protect victims until a month after the Constitutional Court's decision.▶ Standing: Choi Hee-ji / Reporter - "The provisions for forcible intrusion and molestation are included in the sentence. This is Choi Hee-ji of MBN News.  [View full article] - [Bisexual Inclusion] Legislation gap on home invasion and forcible harassment... Victims in lawsuits are 'scary'

【 Anchor Comment 】 To date, there are 7 victims who have reported drinking narcotic beverages. It is known that there are more victims, but most parents are reluctant to report for fear of further harm to their children. So, will accidentally drinking narcotic beverages be subject to punishment? Reporter Choi Hee-ji reported. 【 Reporter 】 Daechi-dong academy district is crowded with students as usual. It looks similar to usual, but the incident occurred on the 3rd. Students and parents are still on edge due to the drugged drink incident. ▶ Interview: Minjae Kim / Daechi-dong, Seoul - "They seem surprised, and since this doesn't happen often, the kids are also worried..." In particular, it is known that there are many parents who are hesitant to report it for fear of their children being stigmatized or suffering time and mental damage from being investigated by the police. ▶ Interview: Younghee Choi / Daechi-dong, Seoul - "What is this (influence) on children as they grow up? It seems ridiculous, and I can't encourage anyone to report it for the sake of protecting children." ▶ Standing: Choi Hee-ji / Reporter - "Under the current law, those who took drugs without knowing will not be punished." ▶ Interview (☎): Cho Seong-geun / Attorney- “If you delivered the drug knowing even vaguely that it was a drug, you may be subject to punishment.” The police urged active reporting and tip-offs, saying that only if many cases of damage are confirmed can the sentences for those involved in the incident be increased, and it is easy to track down higher-ups.  [View full article] - Accidentally drinking drugs is not punishable, but 'shhhh'... “The more reports you make, the easier it is to track superiors.”

It was reported on the 5th that actor Lee Seon-gyun (48), who is suspected of drug use, made a statement during a police investigation to the effect that “I took the drug without knowing it was a drug.” According to the drug crime investigation unit of the Incheon Police Agency, Mr. Lee said during the summons, “Mr. A, the manager of the entertainment establishment, deceived me and gave me something.” He actually admitted to taking the drug itself, but denied intentionality. After being questioned for three hours the previous day, Mr. Lee met with reporters and said, “I answered all the questions with sincerity and told the truth.” As Mr. Lee denied the intentional use of drugs, there was talk in the legal community that this investigation might be proceeding like previous drug investigations of other celebrities. Most people in the entertainment industry said “I didn’t know” when being investigated for drugs and avoided severe punishment. In 2011, G-Dragon (real name Kwon Ji-yong, 35) of the K-pop group Big Bang admitted to inhaling marijuana, but received a suspended indictment. At the time, Mr. Kwon said, “I mistook an item a stranger gave me to smoke, which I mistook for a cigarette, and inhaled it once.” Mr. Kwon was recently booked by the police on suspicion of drug use, but denied it, saying, “I have never taken drugs.” He also said, “I will voluntarily appear before the police on the 6th to ensure a quick and fair investigation.” Yoo Ah-in (real name Eom Hong-sik, 37), who was indicted last month on drug use charges, said, “The administration of zolpidem was for the purpose of treating sleep disorders.” Although he took narcotics, it was for medical purposes and the drug was not taken intentionally. The prosecution requested an arrest warrant for Mr. Eom twice, but it was dismissed. Actor Ha Jung-woo (real name Kim Seong-hoon, 45) also denied in 2020, when controversy over propofol administration arose, saying, “Sleep anesthesia was performed at the discretion of the hospital director.” Mr. Kim was sentenced to a fine of 30 million won by the court. In general, drug users are punished with up to 5 years in prison and a fine of up to 50 million won. The sentence is determined considering intentionality and dosage. Na Chang-soo, a lawyer at Daeryun Law Firm and former chief prosecutor, said, “In the case of the marijuana charge applied to Mr. Lee Seon-kyun, there is a possibility that a suspended indictment may be issued depending on the circumstances such as intentionality, number, and period,” and “There is a possibility that a fine may be imposed on the psychotropic charge.”   [View full article] - Lee Seon-gyun also said, “I didn’t know it was a drug.” Why celebrities?

[Beyond Post Reporter Kim Shin] While many debtors suffered huge losses overnight due to the recent SG Securities stock price drop, a case in which a rehabilitation plan was approved for a debtor is attracting attention. The SG incident was a situation in which the stock prices of nine stocks plummeted simultaneously due to a large amount of reverse trading that occurred in a securities company's CFD (Certain Contract for Difference) account. At Kiwoom Securities, where suspicions of unfair trading in this regard arose, it was confirmed that an executive's related party had sold about 15 billion won in certain stocks before the stock price plunged. Due to this incident, debtors suffered a loss of not only the investment principal, but also up to 2.5 times the principal. Debtors who have suffered losses are considering personal rehabilitation and filing for bankruptcy. However, due to qualification restrictions such as debt limits, it was virtually impossible for professionals and others to apply for personal rehabilitation, so the damage was even more severe as there was no relief plan. It is reported that some of the current debtors are preparing a planning lawsuit to attempt negotiations with securities companies. However, we must be cautious because if we proceed without proper investigation, it may cause secondary damage. In this situation, for the first time, a decision was made to approve a general rehabilitation plan for a large debtor who was unable to apply for personal rehabilitation due to debt incurred due to excessive investment following the SG incident. Attention is being paid to whether the approval decision will open a path to rehabilitation for those in debt despite difficult situations such as negative public opinion on personal debt exemption due to excessive investment and coordination with securities companies and rehabilitation courts due to unprecedented circumstances. Regarding this issue, attorney Daeryun of Law Firm (Limited) said, “I believe that the approval decision was reached as a result of close communication with the investigators and administrators and persuading the securities company, which is the largest creditor,” and added, “I hope that this decision will provide a ray of hope to those who are experiencing difficulties due to debt arising from investments and provide an opportunity for a new start.” Beyond Post Reporter Kim Shin news@beyondpost.co.kr [View full article] - Will there be an opportunity for rehabilitation of debtors with large losses, the first approval decision announced?

Mr. A signed an employment contract with Mr. B, the CEO of an event company, and has been working for the above company since August 2014, performing duties as an event emcee and dance performer. Mr. B filmed a video of Mr. A performing the above tasks and posted it on an Internet web page. After Mr. A left the company in August 2017, he requested Mr. B to delete the above video several times until November 2021. However, when Mr. B did not delete it, a lawsuit (2022 Gahap 207602) was filed against Mr. B, claiming damages, etc. Mr. B deleted the copy of the complaint around March 27, 2023, when he was served. Daegu District Court Civil Division 12 (Presiding Judge Chae Seong-ho) acknowledged infringement of portrait rights on October 5 and ruled, “The defendant must pay 3 million won in compensation to the plaintiff, and the defendant must not post the video on an Internet webpage.” The court first ruled, “No person shall be filmed, drawn, or published without permission, or used for commercial purposes, regarding his or her face or other physical characteristics that can identify him or her as a specific person according to social norms.” “This right to portrait is a right constitutionally guaranteed by the first sentence of Article 10 of our Constitution,” he said. “Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that an unjust infringement on this constitutes an illegal act, and that the person who has suffered such infringement is subject to mental suffering unless there are special circumstances (see Supreme Court decision 2010Da39277, January 27, 2012, etc.).” He continued, "A person who wishes to take or publish a photograph showing another person's face or other physical characteristics that can identify a specific person according to social norms must obtain consent from the person being photographed before taking the photograph. Even if consent to the photograph is obtained, the motive and circumstances for consenting to the photograph, the purpose to be achieved by publishing the photograph, transaction practices, the knowledge, experience and economic status of the person involved, whether the benefits received are balanced, and the relevant information at the time of the photograph were taken." Considering various circumstances, such as whether the method of publicity was foreseeable and whether it is expected that the parties would have made different agreements at the time of consent to photography if they had known such method of publicity, if the person being photographed wishes to make public the information beyond the scope of what is considered acceptable in terms of common sense in society and conventional wisdom at the time of consent to photography, the consent of the person being photographed must also be obtained in this regard,” and “In this case, the fact that consent to taking pictures was obtained from the person being photographed; “The burden of proving that the publication of the taken photo is within the scope permitted by the person being photographed at the time of consent to the photo shoot lies with the person who took the photo or the person who published it (see Supreme Court decision 2021Da219116, delivered on July 21, 2021, etc.).” The court pointed out, "The defendant claims that there was the plaintiff's explicit or implied consent to the filming and posting of the video, but there is no evidence to acknowledge the plaintiff's explicit consent, and even if the plaintiff implicitly consented to the filming and posting of the video while working as an employee of the defendant, in light of the motive and circumstances of the consent, the content and purpose of use of the video, and the possibility of widespread distribution, it is reasonable to believe that such implicit consent is limited to the period the plaintiff worked as an employee." “It is reasonable to believe that the plaintiff’s portrait rights were violated by using a video of the plaintiff beyond the scope of the plaintiff’s employment contract or by neglecting to delete the previously posted video despite the plaintiff’s request for deletion after the termination of the employment contract. Therefore, we have an obligation to compensate the plaintiff for damages for the mental pain suffered as a result.” According to the court, even though the plaintiff requested the defendant to delete the video several times after terminating the employment contract with the defendant around August 2017, the defendant did not delete it, and posted the video for more than 5 years and 6 months from around August 2017 until around March 27, 2023, when a copy of the complaint in this case was served. In addition, the defendant appears to have achieved a certain publicity effect by filming and posting the video, but did not separately pay the plaintiff for it. Mr. A also requested that if Mr. B violates the obligation to prohibit posting of the video, an indirect compulsory payment of 10 million won per month must be paid until the end date of the violation. However, regarding this, the court said, "It is acknowledged that the defendant filed a business closure report on April 7, 2021, and the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to believe that the defendant is likely to violate the obligation to prohibit the posting of videos within a short period of time after this judgment is pronounced. Furthermore, if the defendant violates this, the plaintiff may separately apply for indirect coercion. Therefore, in this case, where the probability that the defendant will violate the above obligation has not yet been proven, indirect coercion may be ordered against the defendant. He did not accept it, saying, “It is difficult to see that there is a need for it.” Daeryun Law Firm represented Mr. A.  [View full article] - [Compensation] Damages awarded to the CEO of an event company who did not delete videos while working despite the request of an employee to leave the company

The Korea Communications Standards Commission (Chairman Ryu Hee-rim) held an appointment ceremony for special committee members in five subcommittees at the Broadcasting Center in Mok-dong, Seoul on the 20th. Previously, the Korea Communications Standards Commission decided to appoint 45 members of special committees in five subcommittees. The Special Committee of the Korea Communications Commission is a statutory committee formed in accordance with the Act on the Establishment and Operation of the Korea Communications Commission. Currently, five subcommittees are in operation: ▲Broadcasting Advisory, ▲Advertising Advisory, ▲Broadcasting Language, ▲Telecommunications Advisory, and ▲Rights and Interest Protection. The members of each special committee are a total of 9 people, including the chairperson, and the chairs of each subcommittee are as follows. Eunkyung Han, Department of Media Communication, Sungkyunkwan University Professor (Broadcasting Advisory Special Committee), Daejin University External Cooperation Vice President Jiyeon-ok Ji (Advertising Advisory Special Committee), Choi Ji-woo, lawyer representing Jiwoo Choi Law Office (Freedom Law Firm) (Broadcasting Language Special Committee), Lee Wook-han, professor at Sookmyung Women's University Law School (Communication Advisory Special Committee), and Kim Joo-seong, CEO of Banwoo Law Firm (Rights Protection Special Committee). The term of office of special committee members is one year, and the appointed special members will perform advisory functions on the duties of each division from October 17, 2023 to October 16, 2024. ■ List of special committee members for each division ● Broadcast Advisory Special Committee Eun-kyung Han, Professor of Media and Communication Department at Sungkyunkwan University Deok-gyu Kim, former SBS grievance handler (Press Arbitration Act) Commissioner Chang-seop Shin Seoul Foundation for Arts and Culture Foundation Director Won Young-il Law Firm Gaon & Raon Lawyer Member Yoon Gil-yong Former Ulsan MBC CEO Lim Jong-hwa Professor of Liberal Arts at Cheongwoon University Young-hee Director of Media Promotion Department at Viewer Media Foundation (Level 2) Chae Myeong-seong Lawyer selected by Law Firm Heo Jin Director of KBS Documentary Department Advertising Advisory Special Committee Ji Yeon-ok Vice President of External Cooperation at Daejin University Kim Jae-ho Professor of Tourism Management at Inha Technical College Taek-ho Ahn Former Andong MBC CEO Oh Ji-eun Professor, Ewha Womans University New Industry Convergence College Oh Tae-yoon Professor of Thoracic Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Sang-yoon Lee Lawyer at Dongin Law Firm Hyeong-kwan Lee Former director of MBC Sports Hong-ryeol Lee Steering committee member of the National Coalition for Fair Media and Head of the Fair Media Monitoring Team Han-soon Lim Special Appointed Professor at Kyungil University ● Ji-woo Choi, Special Committee on Broadcast Language Ji-woo Choi, Ji-woo Choi Law Firm (Freedom Law Firm) Representative lawyer Seong-gon Kang Kim Heung-soo, operating committee member of KBS Korean Language Promotion Agency, outside director of Public Home Shopping, Park Woo-gwi, former Director of Broadcasting Deliberation 2, Korea Communications Standards Commission, Bae Seok-jun, Editor-in-Chief of Legal Newspaper, Yoo Ae-ri, Visiting Professor, Konkuk University Graduate School of Journalism and Public Relations, Lee Jong-gi, former principal of Yewon School, Jeon Mi-young, Homin Education Advisor, Law Firm, Jo Hee-soo, Senior Vice President, Korean Association of Broadcast Critics, Communications Advisory Special Committee, Lee Wook-han, Professor, Sookmyung Women's University Law School, Moon Jae-cheol KT Skylife CEO and former YTN Washington Bureau Chief Park Seung-yong Former Bareunmirae Party policy committee member Ahn So-yang Attorney at Daeryun Law Firm Lee Young-mi Former KBS Radio Center Central Chairman Jang Ok-nim Former KBS Radio Center Director Ji Dae-beom Former Korea Local Information Development Institute Director Hwang Seon-wook Former YTN Digital Center Director Hwang Seong-hyun Edelman Korea Executive Director Kim Joo-seong Special Committee on Rights Protection Kim Kang-hyun Representative Attorney at Banwoo Law Firm Kim In-young, policy advisory member of the Korean Medical Association, former head of KBS press headquarters, Seo Jeong-ho, professor of the Department of Media and Communication at Gachon University, Lee Yong-nam, unnamed representative of an unknown film company and film director, Lee Jeong-hyun, member of the Media Rating Committee, Ji-yeon Lee, professor of elementary education at Korea National University of Education, Hyun-min Lee, CEO of Law & Culture, Seung-gyeong Hwang, adjunct professor of the Department of Theater and Film at Daekyung University, appointed as members of special committees in five divisions, including the National Security Commission and communications advisory.

past 24work afternoon 2At the Irum Hall of the Irum Center in Yeouido, Seoul. “AI Assistive technology for the disabled using technology: Tasks toward innovation and challenge”A policy debate was held on the topic:.This event was organized by the Korean Federation of Persons with Disabilities and the office of National Assembly member Lee Jong-seong., It was co-hosted by the Korea Association for the Physically Disabled., on‧It took place offline.Chet recentlyGPT Using big data or robot technology, Let's look at examples of how innovative technologies such as artificial intelligence are applied to assistive technology for the disabled., Development and dissemination to promote innovative change, It was a policy debate to promote independence and change in quality of life for people with disabilities through market revitalization..Professor Son Byeong-chang of the Department of Rehabilitation Medical Engineering at Nazareth University “AI Assistive technology devices using technology: Current usage and challenges”He gave a presentation on the topic:.Professor Son said first,GPTAre you a strong artificial intelligence?, When asked if it was weak artificial intelligence, he answered that it was strong artificial intelligence.. When I asked again if it was weak artificial intelligence, I answered that it was strong artificial intelligence., When I asked him again if he was lying, he said he was not lying.. SheeshGPTThey say he's good at lying too, He said he needed tips on how to use it..1950Already in the 1990s AIThe concept of, AIHe said it is a new opportunity and challenge for people with disabilities.. AI(artificial intelligence)is a two-way voice conversation, image recognition, Accessibility for people with disabilities can be improved by using technologies such as virtual reality., Document recognition for the visually impaired, It was said that image recognition is expected to be of great help in knowledge access and environmental awareness.. ocam myi(OrCam MyEye) Using artificial intelligence object recognition as an example, facial recognition of objects or opponents, The document was said to be readable..Reading the text quickly, If you point to the text with your finger, it will read that part., The function that notifies you when a pre-memorized face appears and the function that tells you the date and time when you show the back of your hand is amazing. ‘ITshipbuilding’We introduced the opinions of users published in.The hearing impaired XPERTvoice in four-message-An automatic subtitle translator is being provided., Soboro Tap Business, It was said that tikita captions are also used as a communication tool.. Currently, sign language is provided on Zoom by a sign language interpreter., Automatic sign language interpreters are currently being technologically advanced and their use will become a reality in the near future..Systems that provide tactile warning of emergency situations are also commercially available in foreign countries.. Applications of artificial intelligence technology for people with speech disabilities include products such as Dream Phone, which supports language training and long-distance communication..Artificial intelligence technology for the physically disabled Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri There is technology to control the environment through voice commands, etc., It is said that the development of technology for self-driving artificial intelligence robot wheelchairs, such as Hyulim Robot, is accelerating the development of products that use artificial intelligence to operate wheelchairs..Artificial intelligence technology for people with brain lesions and disabilities Tobii Dynavox, Grid3, Snap Core First There are communication devices such as, NeofectThere are also rehabilitation digital treatments using virtual reality.. one side SKTIn order to prevent challenging behavior in people with developmental disabilities, artificial intelligence software has been developed to observe..He said that future use of artificial intelligence will also require technology to protect personal information and understand and control artificial intelligence algorithms.. In the development of artificial intelligence assistive technology devices, reflection of user opinions and policies to support purchase costs due to expensive products should also be implemented in parallel.. Although the technical idea of ​​the product is great, there are many cases where the actual user convenience or environment is not considered., The low awareness of the developed product was also pointed out as an obstacle to the promotion of new assistive technology devices for the disabled..Gwangok Ahn, a researcher at the National Rehabilitation Center, said that the global assistive technology market is currently 40Annually in trillion won 6Showing percent growth, Technology using artificial intelligence 17%is showing growth 3It is said to be twice as fast.. Accordingly, the National Rehabilitation Center also said that its research and development project to commercialize assistive devices for independent living of the elderly and disabled reflects user needs and focuses on innovation of assistive devices and advancement of open platforms..And with the development plan 5He gave an example of a development project. “Smart safety control device applicable to various mobility”, “IoT Connected mobility and service platform utilizing technology”, “Disabled children growing up adaptive mobility Orthotic development”, “Development of a bladder capacity monitoring wearable device for urination management”, “smart glasses, AIDevelopment of situational awareness assistance service using” etc. were introduced..Attorney Choi Bo-yoon of Daeryun Law Firm said in a discussion titled “There must be improvement to a consumer-centered system,”, manufacturing, Certification registration, supply, use, It was said that user intervention was necessary in the evaluation process..It was pointed out that systematic management was difficult due to the lack of a control tower for research., Speed ​​of certification process, Scattered relevant laws, Lack of rental activation, The lack of information on assistive devices suitable for me was pointed out through video examples., my6The comprehensive policy plan for the disabled includes a plan for a living map., Argued that a consumer-centered platform was needed.Park Jung-seo, director of the Korea Employment Agency for the Disabled Assistive Technology Center, said in a discussion that the support of assistive devices in the working environment does not affect the accuracy of job performance. 49.3%has increased, The work performance speed is 49.3% increase, Productivity is 46.6%, Overall job satisfaction is 47.2%It was said that there was an increase in.Center Director Park introduced representative products of assistive technology devices that are being supported., With research and development support 22In the 2018 project, it was said that voice recognition-based height-adjustable beds are very popular among visually impaired massage industry workers..In addition, a smart vest with anxiety stress relief function, obstacle, Implementation of two-way voice calls for non-disabled people, IoT Technology-based customized stoma care package, on device Real-time image recognition, Motion-Aware Smart Braille DP, Intelligent safety management smart care system, They also introduced video recognition guidance robots.. and to expand employment of the disabled. AI He said that research is also underway on how to apply the latest technology based on a robot convergence platform..Sullivan Plus and Sullivan combine artificial intelligence technology for the visually impaired ACho Soo-won, CEO of TwoArt, which is launching a product called , said in a discussion that the economic feasibility of investment is weak due to the small market., Users express difficulties as developers, such as high costs even with government support., ‘wow points’We also discussed the inability to match well..At first, new attempts and possibilities ‘wow!’ This means that people keep saying exclamations like this, but when they actually use it, they are turned away because it is inconvenient and falls below expectations.. Related organizations will be able to resolve various challenges well in the future., He also expressed his determination to continue to try new things in cooperation with consumers..Most of the listener inquiries were about solving problems in development and distribution to lower the price and popularize it., If large corporations participate, wouldn't small and medium-sized businesses be able to withstand the problem of lack of profitability?, Ideas were raised such as whether good product development could be achieved if government support and large corporations joined hands..However, large companies have complex and slow decision-making structures., There is low interest in assistive technology for the disabled., Since innovative technologies are abundant, there was also a counter-argument that it would be more desirable for large corporations to provide technology to small and medium-sized enterprises as a social contribution and for the government to support specialized small and medium-sized enterprises to develop well..  [View full article] - AI Review of policy debate on assistive technology for the disabled using technology

| Promise to develop UNCRPD analysis indicators and support civil and criminal legal counseling, etc.Daeryun Law Firm (Lihan) announced on the 12th that it signed a business agreement with the Korea Association for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled on the 11th to provide legal advice on improving the system to guarantee the rights of the disabled. Through this business agreement, we will begin research to harmonize domestic laws with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD). The two organizations plan to △develop UNCRPD analysis indicators △present disability law review enactment and amendments △support civil and criminal legal counseling for members of the Korea Association for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled. In addition, we plan to spare no effort in providing support in the legal field by promoting joint projects such as education and public interest seminars to protect the rights of the disabled. Chief attorney Chan-Woo Jeong said, "It is meaningful to contribute to the promotion of the rights of the disabled through legal support for the Korea Association for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled." He added, "We will do our best to realize social value together by making full use of Daeryun's capabilities and human resources for the association." “We expect our expertise to be strengthened,” he said, adding, “We will more actively carry out activities in areas that require legal assistance, such as the enactment of laws, so that disabled people can be guaranteed their reasonable rights through mutual assistance.” Meanwhile, Daeryun Law Firm (Limited) is a large domestic law firm that ranked 10th in Korea within 5 years of its establishment in 2018. It has 22 specialized centers, including school violence, sex crimes, construction, and real estate. It currently operates 32 offices nationwide, and recently opened a new office separate from the existing office in the Daegu and Gwangju areas, and is planning to open a new office in the Anyang area.  [View full article] Money Today - Daeryun Law Firm (Limited) and Korea Association for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled, MOU to promote the rights and interests of the disabled The Indigo - Rehabilitation Association and Daeryun Law Firm signed a business agreement for ‘legal advice for the rights and interests of disabled citizens’