

Q
I have a question about administrative litigation over disciplinary action against public officials.
Views7,963
Hello, I have a question regarding administrative litigation over disciplinary action against public officials. I am a public official, and I recently received a disciplinary action over a certain incident, so I am planning to pursue administrative litigation. It seems to be a somewhat excessive disciplinary action. Would it be better to pursue administrative litigation over the disciplinary action with an attorney's help after all?
administrative litigation over disciplinary action against public officials
disciplinary action against public officials
administrative litigation
Answer to Related Inquiry
Author: 정찬우
I will provide an answer regarding administrative litigation over disciplinary action against public officials.
Administrative litigation over disciplinary action against public officials is a lawsuit filed with a court to contest a disciplinary disposition imposed on a public official.
If a public official contests a decision of the Appeals Review Committee, they may file administrative litigation within 90 days from the date on which they were served with the original copy of that decision.
In this lawsuit, the unlawfulness of the disciplinary disposition may be contested, for example on the ground that there is no cause for discipline or that there is a procedural defect.
The procedure for contesting a disciplinary action against a public official can be broadly divided into an appeals review of the Disciplinary Committee's decision and, as the subsequent stage, administrative litigation.
A public official who has received a disciplinary disposition may file an appeal with the Appeals Review Committee, and if they also contest the result of the appeal, they may file administrative litigation.
In administrative litigation, the main issues include whether the disciplinary disposition ▲was based on the facts, ▲whether the level of discipline (its severity) amounts to a deviation from or abuse of discretionary power, and ▲whether procedural fairness was ensured.
For example, if excessively heavy discipline was imposed for the same misconduct, or if there was a procedural defect in the Disciplinary Committee, this may constitute a ground for revocation.
However, courts tend to broadly recognize an agency's discretion in light of the gravity of the disciplinary matter and the special nature of a public official's duties, so it is difficult to win the case merely by arguing that "the discipline is too heavy."
Therefore, it is necessary to review the case records, analyze similar precedents, and organize the legal arguments for the defense, and at this stage, obtaining the assistance of an attorney with extensive experience in administrative litigation is practically advantageous.
At Daeryun Law LLC, attorneys specializing in administrative law who have handled numerous administrative appeals and lawsuits provide legal assistance throughout the entire process, from the appeals review stage to administrative litigation, helping with the systematic proof of the facts, arguments as to unlawfulness and impropriety, and the presentation of grounds for mitigation, in order to seek revocation of the discipline.

Constitutional, Administrative, Regulatory, and Reform Matters Attorney
Legal consultation booking
All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.
Phone
consultation 1800-7905
Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

KakaoTalk
consultation
KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

Online
consultation
We provide tailored
legal services.
Deals & Cases
More
Related Practice Areas
More
Do you have more questions?





