CONTENTS
- 1. The Client Who Held a Family Case Consultation

- - How the Decision Was Made to Consider Applying for Commencement of Adult Guardianship
- 2. Response Strategy for the Family Case and Scope of Assistance

- - Argument of the Family Law Attorney ① | Proof of the Pattern of Change in Mental State
- - Argument of the Family Law Attorney ② | Request for an Expert Psychiatric Examination by the Court's Authority
- - Argument of the Family Law Attorney ③ | Establishing the Risk of Harm to Property by a Third Party
- 3. Outcome of the Response to the Family Case: ‘Decision to Commence Adult Guardianship’

- - Differences Between Adult Guardianship and Limited Guardianship
- - If You Need Assistance with a Family Case?
1. The Client Who Held a Family Case Consultation
The client who held a family case consultation was in a situation in which, while residing abroad, he confirmed the worsening of his father's dementia and indications of harm to his father's property, and he requested a consultation in order to put in place prompt legal protective measures.
How the Decision Was Made to Consider Applying for Commencement of Adult Guardianship
The client who visited a family law attorney to apply for commencement of adult guardianship had been residing abroad when he heard that the dementia symptoms of his father, who had been living alone, had rapidly worsened, and he urgently returned to the country.
Upon confirmation after returning, the client learned that there were indications that the caregiver hired to look after his father had exploited his father's diminished cognitive capacity to misappropriate money for private purposes.
Accordingly, the client concluded that legal measures were urgently needed to prevent further harm to his father's property and personal interests and to block the caregiver's improper access.
Ultimately, in order to apply for commencement of adult guardianship as an institutional safeguard to protect his father, the client visited a family law attorney to seek a consultation regarding the family case.

2. Response Strategy for the Family Case and Scope of Assistance
While the procedure for commencement of adult guardianship in the family case was underway, the court issued a correction order directing that the purport of the claim be changed to limited guardianship, on the ground that the father's K-MMSE score was relatively high.
The family law attorney, however, noting that the father's cognitive function was rapidly declining, pursued the following strategy in this family case.
What Is the K-MMSE?
Argument of the Family Law Attorney ① | Proof of the Pattern of Change in Mental State
The family law attorney comprehensively analyzed the father's past medical records and the results of cognitive function tests conducted on several occasions.
Through this, the attorney emphasized that the father was not in a state of temporary decline but in a process of continuous deterioration of cognitive function due to progressive Alzheimer's disease.
In particular, the attorney confirmed that a recent additional examination had resulted in a diagnosis of moderate dementia, and organized, with objective materials, the fact that cognitive ability had progressively declined as compared with the earlier initial-stage assessment.
Accordingly, by submitting the relevant medical certificate and examination results as evidence, the family law attorney actively established that the client's father was in a state going beyond mild cognitive impairment and requiring continuous protection and legal management.
Argument of the Family Law Attorney ② | Request for an Expert Psychiatric Examination by the Court's Authority
In a situation where the court had recommended limited guardianship, the family law attorney requested that the court, by its authority, order an expert psychiatric examination in order to confirm that the client's father was currently in a state of continuously lacking the capacity to handle affairs.
In addition, the attorney guided the procedure so that the person concerned in the case could appear before the court in person and have his diminished capacity of judgment directly confirmed through an interview with the judge.
Argument of the Family Law Attorney ③ | Establishing the Risk of Harm to Property by a Third Party
The family law attorney organized and submitted as materials the records of the caregiver's repeated withdrawals of money from the father's account and the flow of funds whose use was unclear.
In addition, while establishing the circumstances indicating an attempt to register a marriage, the attorney made clear to the court that, should the caregiver acquire the status of a lawful spouse in the future, this could have a significant impact on the disposition of property or on the inheritance relationship.
The family law attorney emphasized that, although the client's father was capable of expressing his intentions in everyday matters, he was in a state in which it was difficult for him to independently judge important legal acts such as the disposition of property.
Accordingly, the attorney established, on the basis of concrete materials, that commencement of adult guardianship was necessary in order to institutionally block the intervention of a third party and to promote stable management of the property
3. Outcome of the Response to the Family Case: ‘Decision to Commence Adult Guardianship’

In the early part of the adjudication on commencement of adult guardianship in the family case, the court recommended a change to limited guardianship on the basis of the cognitive function test results and other factors.
The family law attorney, however, continued to submit additional materials and to actively establish the case, arguing in concrete terms for the necessity of adult guardianship, and, after the procedures of an expert psychiatric examination by the court's authority and an examination of the person concerned, a decision to commence adult guardianship was ultimately rendered.
Differences Between Adult Guardianship and Limited Guardianship
In family cases, adult guardianship is a system that provides comprehensive protection where the capacity to handle affairs is continuously lacking, whereas limited guardianship is a system that provides limited support within a specific scope where capacity is partly deficient, and the two differ in this respect.
Category | Adult Guardianship | Limited Guardianship |
Legal basis | Article 9 of the 「Civil Act」 | Article 12 of the 「Civil Act」 |
Eligibility requirements | Where the capacity to handle affairs is continuously lacking due to illness, disability, old age, or the like | Where the capacity to handle affairs is deficient due to illness, disability, old age, or the like |
Level of judgment capacity | A state in which overall decision-making capacity is almost absent or has been lost | A state in which some judgment capacity remains but there is difficulty in handling important affairs |
Scope of guardianship | Comprehensive protection and representation as to property management and personal affairs as a whole | Protection and consent as to limited and specific affairs within the scope set by the court |
Effect of the person's own acts | In principle, the guardian represents the person in legal acts | In principle the person acts for himself or herself, but the guardian's consent is required within the scope set by the court |
When applicable | Where comprehensive protection is needed | Where partial and supplementary protection is needed |
See More
If You Need Assistance with a Family Case?
A family case is an area that directly affects all aspects of an individual's life, including family relationships, property, and personal protection, so careful review of the organization of the facts and of whether the legal requirements are met is important.
At the consultation stage, the family law attorney of Daeryun Law Firm closely ascertains the course of the case and the current situation, and then legally reviews whether the requirements for adult guardianship are met.
In addition, the attorney responds stage by stage to the procedures required in the course of the trial, such as responding to a correction order, submitting additional materials, and proceeding with the expert psychiatric examination procedure, and provides systematic assistance so that the court can fully determine the necessity.
If you need assistance with a family case in a situation such as the above, please request the help of a 🔗family law attorney who, after accurately diagnosing the characteristics of the matter and the current situation, will present a tailored response strategy.

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.












