CONTENTS
- 1. The Client Who Came to the Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney
- - How the Client Came to the Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney
- 2. The Statutes Relevant to the Case as Explained by the Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney
- 3. The Assistance Provided by the Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney
- - The Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney's Argument That the Client Was Deeply Remorseful
- - The Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney's Argument That the Client Had Made a Deposit
- - The Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney's Argument That the Client Was Receiving Psychiatric Treatment
- 4. The Court's Determination on the Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney's Arguments
- - If You Need the Help of the Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney
1. The Client Who Came to the Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney
The Jinju obstruction of official duties attorney was sought out by the client, who held a consultation with the obstruction of official duties attorney at the Jinju Office in order to resolve the case together with a specialized attorney.
How the Client Came to the Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney
The client in this case, while intoxicated, made a false report to 112 and then assaulted the responding police officer while shouting profanities.
When the police officer tried to calm the client with kind words, the client thought he was being mocked and picked a quarrel with the officer.
The police tried to persuade the client, but the client, unable to contain his anger, committed assault by pushing the officer's shoulder, kicking him, and striking him in the solar plexus.
In the end, the client faced 🔗the crime of obstruction of official duties and was at risk of an actual custodial sentence.
In order to resolve the case together with a specialized attorney, the client requested assistance from the Jinju obstruction of official duties attorney.
2. The Statutes Relevant to the Case as Explained by the Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney
Crimes Concerning the Obstruction of Official Duties
Article 136 (Obstruction of Official Duties)
(1) A person who commits assault or intimidation against a public official engaged in the performance of duties shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine not exceeding 10 million won.
(2) The same penalty as in the preceding paragraph shall apply to a person who commits assault or intimidation against a public official for the purpose of compelling or obstructing the performance of an official act, or of forcing the official to resign.
Article 137 (Obstruction of Official Duties by Deceit)
A person who obstructs the performance of a public official's duties by deceit shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine not exceeding 10 million won.
Article 143 (Attempts)
An attempt to commit any of the crimes under Articles 140 through the preceding Article shall be punished.
Article 144 (Special Obstruction of Official Duties)
(1) Where a person commits any of the crimes under Articles 136, 138, and 140 through the preceding Article by displaying the power of a group or multitude or by carrying a dangerous object, the penalty prescribed for each respective Article shall be increased by up to one half.
(2) Where a person commits a crime under Paragraph 1 and thereby causes injury to a public official, the person shall be punished by imprisonment for a definite term of not less than three years. Where the person causes death, the person shall be punished by imprisonment for life or for a definite term of not less than five years.
3. The Assistance Provided by the Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney
The Jinju obstruction of official duties attorney established a step-by-step strategy in order to reduce the client's sentence as much as possible, and conducted the defense by making the arguments set out below.
The Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney's Argument That the Client Was Deeply Remorseful
It was emphasized that the client was deeply ashamed of his offense and that he had written a letter of apology, pledging never to repeat the same wrongdoing.
The Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney's Argument That the Client Had Made a Deposit
It was emphasized that, in order to convey a sincere apology to the injured police officer, the client made a criminal deposit with an official depository.
The Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney's Argument That the Client Was Receiving Psychiatric Treatment
It was emphasized that the client committed the offense in a psychologically unstable state and that, because he is currently receiving psychiatric counseling and treatment on a consistent basis, there is no risk of reoffending.
4. The Court's Determination on the Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney's Arguments
The court accepted the arguments of the Jinju obstruction of official duties attorney and ruled, ‘The defendant shall be sentenced to six months' imprisonment. However, the execution of the said sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final.’
If You Need the Help of the Jinju Obstruction of Official Duties Attorney
In a criminal case, the early response is very important.
In order to secure the critical early window in a case, the assistance of an attorney specializing in criminal cases can be considered essential.
Daeryun forms teams of attorneys specializing in criminal cases, ranging from 3 to 20 members depending on the scale of the case, and presents a reasonable and appropriate 🔗criminal case strategy.
Consultation and prompt response are also available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
If you need the assistance of a specialized attorney, please reach out to the Jinju obstruction of official duties attorney at any time.
This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.
