CONTENTS
- 1. The Client Who Came to the Pyeongtaek Criminal Attorney
- - How the Client Came to Visit the Pyeongtaek Attorney
- - Statutes Related to the Case, as Explained by the Pyeongtaek Attorney
- 2. Assistance Provided by the Pyeongtaek Criminal Attorney
- - Pyeongtaek Attorney Argues That the Client Acknowledges All of the Facts Charged and Is Remorseful
- - Pyeongtaek Attorney Argues That There Is No Record Beyond a Fine
- - Pyeongtaek Attorney Argues That the Degree of Violence Was Minor
- 3. Result of the Pyeongtaek Criminal Attorney's Assistance, “Suspended Sentence”
- - The Criminal Attorney's Case Review
1. The Client Who Came to the Pyeongtaek Criminal Attorney
The client who requested help from the Pyeongtaek criminal attorney came to the Pyeongtaek criminal attorney while facing criminal punishment for obstruction of official duties on a charge of assaulting a police officer.
How the Client Came to Visit the Pyeongtaek Attorney
This is the account of the client charged with obstruction of official duties, who consulted with the Pyeongtaek criminal attorney.
On the day of the incident, the client got into an argument with the owner of a shop, Shop A, located in Pyeongtaek after drinking and failing to pay for the drinks.
In response, the shop owner reported the client to the police.
While the police who responded were carrying out the procedure to verify the client's identity, the intoxicated client grabbed the officer by the collar and shook him several times, assaulting him.
In the end, the client was arrested at the scene under emergency arrest on a charge of obstruction of official duties, and was facing a criminal case.
Fearful of punishment, the client came to the Pyeongtaek Office and requested assistance from a criminal attorney at Daeryun.
Statutes Related to the Case, as Explained by the Pyeongtaek Attorney
What Is Obstruction of Official Duties?
When the duties of a public official are obstructed, the 'crime of obstruction of official duties' is established. In most cases, this involves categories of public officials engaged in enforcement, such as police officers or firefighters.
Criminal Act Article 136 (Obstruction of Official Duties)
① A person who, by means of violence or intimidation against a public official engaged in the performance of his duties, shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine not exceeding 10 million won.
② The same punishment as in the preceding paragraph shall apply to a person who, with the intent to compel or obstruct a public official in the performance of an act pertaining to his duties, or to make him resign from office, commits violence or intimidation against him.
2. Assistance Provided by the Pyeongtaek Criminal Attorney
The Pyeongtaek criminal attorney conducted a thorough consultation with the client and gained a detailed understanding of the circumstances of the case.
The Pyeongtaek criminal attorney gathered the client's sentencing factors and argued as follows.
Pyeongtaek Attorney Argues That the Client Acknowledges All of the Facts Charged and Is Remorseful
The client stated that, being heavily intoxicated, he had mistakenly believed he had already paid for the drinks and left the shop, and that he seemed to have assaulted the responding police officer while drunk.
The Pyeongtaek criminal attorney emphasized that the client acknowledged all of the facts charged against him and was deeply remorseful.
Pyeongtaek Attorney Argues That There Is No Record Beyond a Fine
The Pyeongtaek criminal attorney argued that, although the client had a prior record of being punished with a fine about 10 years earlier, he had no record of being punished more severely than that.
Pyeongtaek Attorney Argues That the Degree of Violence Was Minor
The Pyeongtaek criminal attorney emphasized that the assault on the police officer did not cause serious bodily injury but remained at a minor level.
3. Result of the Pyeongtaek Criminal Attorney's Assistance, “Suspended Sentence”
The court, accepting the argument of the Pyeongtaek criminal attorney, rendered a suspended sentence judgment in this criminal case.
Satisfied with the result, the client expressed his gratitude to the Pyeongtaek criminal attorney.
The Criminal Attorney's Case Review
The case above is 🔗obstruction of official duties an example in which a client who was sued on a charge received a suspended sentence judgment with the help of the Pyeongtaek criminal attorney.
In the case of obstruction of official duties, unlike ordinary criminal cases, reaching a settlement with the victim is very difficult, so it is advisable to resolve the case with the help of an experienced attorney.
At the criminal group of Daeryun Law Firm, criminal attorneys with extensive practical experience and expertise grasp the precise facts of a case and, through a thorough legal review, provide solutions tailored to the client.
If you are facing difficulties defending against a criminal case in a situation similar to the case above, please feel free to request assistance from the Pyeongtaek criminal attorney of Daeryun Law Firm at any time.
This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.
