Page title background (PC version)Page title background (mobile version)

Deals & Cases

Insult

A Case Assisting a First-Time Insult Offender | A Small Fine Imposed, and What Is the Difference Between Insult and Defamation?

This is the story of a client who was a first-time insult offender. The client sought an attorney's assistance, saying that the client had committed insult, and asked for a defense against punishment as a first-time offender. The attorney obtained a small fine.

CONTENTS
  • 1. The Circumstances of the First-Time Insult Offender Client's Case
  • 2. First-Time Insult Offender: What Is Insult?
    • - What Is the Difference Between Insult and Defamation?
  • 3. Assistance Provided for the First-Time Insult Offender Client
    • - Emphasizing That the Victim Had Refused the First-Time Insult Offender Client's Legitimate Instructions
    • - Emphasizing That the Openness Was Low
    • - Emphasizing That the Client Was a First-Time Offender
  • 4. The First-Time Insult Offender Client, Case Result: "A Minor Fine"

1. The Circumstances of the First-Time Insult Offender Client's Case

This is the story of a client who was a first-time insult offender.

The client asked for a defense against punishment, saying that the client had committed insult, and the attorney listened in detail to the account of the client's case.

First-Time Insult Offender

The client was working as the sales team leader at a company, and the complainant, A, who had accused the client on a charge of insult, was a member of the client's team.

The client gave A work-related instructions, but A repeatedly refused to comply and made rude remarks to the client, such as “Why do I have to do that?”

Unable to hold back, the client reportedly shouted profanity at A in a loud voice and yelled at A to follow the instructions.

A then accused the client of openly insulting A, and this led to the present case.

2. First-Time Insult Offender: What Is Insult?

This client came to an attorney after being accused of 🔗insult.

Insult refers to the offense of openly insulting a person, where to insult means to disparage and degrade a person.

For insult to be recognized, there must be openness, that is, the possibility of dissemination, and there must be intent in the act.

A person who commits insult may, under the Criminal Act, be punished by imprisonment with or without labor for up to one year or a fine of up to 2 million won.

What Is the Difference Between Insult and Defamation?

You may be confused about the difference between insult and 🔗defamation.

Defamation refers to openly insulting a person by stating a fact, while insult refers to simply insulting a person without stating any fact.

Insult is usually established through profanity, criticism, curses, and the like, and in addition, the act of insulting a person through a gesture or movement can also be established as insult.

3. Assistance Provided for the First-Time Insult Offender Client

For the first-time insult offender client, the attorney provided assistance as follows.

Emphasizing That the Victim Had Refused the First-Time Insult Offender Client's Legitimate Instructions

As a ground for mitigation, the attorney cited the fact that, regarding the circumstances in which the client had directed profanity at the victim, the victim had refused the client's legitimate instructions.

The victim refused to follow the client's instructions, made rude remarks to the client, and also criticized the client within the office.

The client directed the profanity in this case in the course of trying to correct the victim's behavior.

Emphasizing That the Openness Was Low

As a ground for mitigation, the attorney cited the low degree of openness regarding the client's act of directing profanity at the victim.

The place where this incident occurred was an office, but only the client, the victim, and just two other employees were present.

One of the two employees was resting with their head down on the desk at the time the incident occurred and so did not hear the client's words and conduct, and the other party stated that, although they heard the words and conduct, they did not hear any of the content at all.

The attorney emphasized that it was difficult to find that the client's remarks had openness.

Emphasizing That the Client Was a First-Time Offender

As a ground for mitigation, the attorney cited the fact that the client was a first-time offender with no prior criminal punishment of any kind.

The client emphasized that the client had lived an upstanding life in society, with no criminal punishment and not even any history of police investigation.

4. The First-Time Insult Offender Client, Case Result: "A Minor Fine"

First-Time Insult Offender Attorney
Clicking the image above takes you to the Daeryun Law Firm consultation booking page.

After hearing from the attorney who represented the client, the court imposed a fine of 500,000 won on the client.

The client had hurled profanity at the victim and degraded the victim within the office even though other employees could hear.

In such a case, insult is established and the client could have been heavily punished, yet through the attorney's assistance the client was able to receive a small fine of 500,000 won.

Even a first-time insult offender may, depending on the circumstances, receive a severe punishment of imprisonment.

If you are facing the risk of punishment for insult, as the client in this case was, seeking an attorney's assistance for a defense against punishment is recommended.

Daeryun Law Firm operates offices throughout the country and provides the same quality of service whichever office you visit.

If you need assistance, please visit a nearby Daeryun office and request a consultation.

모욕죄초범 | 모욕죄초범 의뢰인 소액의 벌금형 선고, 모욕죄와 명예훼손죄 차이는?

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Related Practice Areas

More

Criminal Matters · Insult
Related Information
Background

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's exclusive AI · IT
litigation strategies
Over 260
key members
1,200+ cases
handled monthly

* January 2026 Bar Association Transit Permit Issuance Criteria

*Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 Paragraph 1

Attorney
Legal consultation booking

All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.

Phone
consultation 1800-7905

Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

Phone booking

KakaoTalk
consultation

KakaoTalk channel

Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

KakaoTalk booking

Online
consultation

We provide tailored
legal services.

Online booking
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk