CONTENTS
- 1. The Client's Situation
- - How the Client Came to the School Violence Attorney
- 2. The Relevant Statutes Explained by the Uijeongbu Law Firm
- 3. The Uijeongbu Law Firm's Assistance
- - The School Violence Attorney's Argument ① Seriousness
- - The School Violence Attorney's Argument ② Persistence
- - The School Violence Attorney's Argument ③ Intentionality
- 4. The School Violence Committee's Decision on the Uijeongbu Law Firm's Arguments
- - If You Need the Help of a School Violence Attorney
1. The Client's Situation
Seeking to resolve a school violence case promptly through a Uijeongbu-area law firm that had handled many school violence cases, the client came to the Uijeongbu office to request help.
How the Client Came to the School Violence Attorney
The student who caused the harm in this case was joking around with a friend with whom he was normally close, and the joking gradually went too far.
The friend, who began to feel uncomfortable, asked the offending student for an apology, but he would not accept it at all.
The argument between the two gradually escalated into a physical fight.
The client, who had been watching them nearby, tried to mediate the fight by stopping the offending student's behavior in order to settle the situation.
However, the offending student, unable to contain his anger, repeatedly threatened the client, strangling his neck and breaking his glasses, inflicting school violence.
The client reported the offending student for school violence, but the other party also reported the client as a 🔗school violence perpetrator, placing the client in a difficult position.
Seeking to obtain a decision of no measures through the assistance of an attorney with experience handling a variety of school violence cases, the client came to the Uijeongbu law firm.
2. The Relevant Statutes Explained by the Uijeongbu Law Firm
The client, identified as a school violence perpetrator, came to a school violence attorney seeking a decision of no measures. When a person identified as a school violence perpetrator goes through the School Violence Committee, the following measures may be imposed.
Measure 1: A written apology
Measure 2: Prohibition of contact with or retaliation against the victim student
Measure 3: School service (volunteer work within the school)
Measure 4: Community service (volunteer work somewhere other than the school)
Measure 5: Special education or psychological treatment
Measure 6: Suspension from attendance
Measure 7: Class transfer
Measure 8: Transfer to another school
Measure 9: Expulsion
When the School Violence Committee recognizes a matter as school violence and decides on a measure for the offending student, it considers the seriousness, persistence, and intentionality of the school violence, the degree of remorse, and the degree of reconciliation as its basic factors.
3. The Uijeongbu Law Firm's Assistance
To prevent the client from receiving an unnecessary measure, the Uijeongbu law firm made the following arguments.
The School Violence Attorney's Argument ① Seriousness
The offending student's conduct amounts to infliction of bodily injury, intimidation, insult, and destruction of property.
Treating the client, who had done nothing wrong, as an outlet for his anger, using physical force to cause injury, and then spitting in his face is clearly a serious act of violence.
The attorney therefore emphasized that it was reasonable to regard the seriousness of this case as very high.
The School Violence Attorney's Argument ② Persistence
Not content with committing serious violence because he could not control his anger, the offending student refused to acknowledge his wrongdoing at all.
He even went so far as to commit secondary harm against the client.
The attorney emphasized that the offending student's acts of violence were highly persistent.
The School Violence Attorney's Argument ③ Intentionality
Even though the client had done nothing wrong, the offending student inflicted very serious injury and threatened him several times merely because he was angry.
The attorney emphasized that the offending student used violence with the purpose of inflicting physical and psychological harm on the client, that this could not be regarded as mere joking or a mistake, and that the intentionality was therefore very high.
4. The School Violence Committee's Decision on the Uijeongbu Law Firm's Arguments
The School Violence Countermeasures Deliberation Committee, accepting the school violence attorney's arguments, issued a decision of no measures to the client and imposed on the offending student measures including a prohibition of contact, threats, and retaliation, 5 hours of school service, and 8 hours of special education.
The client then expressed deep thanks to the Uijeongbu law firm.
If You Need the Help of a School Violence Attorney
If you are involved in an allegation of school violence, receiving the assistance of an attorney can be helpful in preventing unnecessary measures.
At Daeryun Law Firm, a 🔗school violence attorney works alongside clients from the School Violence Committee filing stage through the conclusion of litigation, providing active assistance.
The firm provides comprehensive legal services, including a safety and personal protection service offered through its own security center and support that takes into account the psychological needs of victim students, devoting its full efforts to resolving the case.
If you need the help of the Uijeongbu law firm in a situation similar to the case above, please find a solution through a 🔗legal consultation reservation.
This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.
