Page title background (PC version)Page title background (mobile version)

Case Analysis / Legal Updates

Daeryun Law LLC, with expertise across practice areas,
provides analysis of court rulings and legal issues.

Korea promises ‘highest priority supply’ amidst war in the Middle East and blockade of Hormuz… Is this a signal for a reorganization of the energy supply chain?

Military conflict in the Middle East and the virtual blockade of the Strait of Hormuz are issues that are causing structural changes throughout the global energy supply chain.

In particular, the fact that the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries designated Korea as a ‘priority supply target’ is a result of reflecting strategic interests beyond diplomatic rhetoric.

In this article, we conduct an in-depth analysis of trends based on the latest international situation and news articles, and specifically review the risks and response strategies that companies may face from a legal and economic perspective.

CONTENTS
  • 1. Tensions in the Strait of Hormuz increase... A practical blockade structure in an open state
    • - Gap between ‘freedom of navigation’ under international law and reality
  • 2. The essence of the situation is not ‘production shortage’ but ‘transportation blockage’
    • - Comparison of supply disruptions and increased production scale
  • 3. “Give it to Korea first”… Hidden calculation of GCC priority supply declaration
    • - Korea is a key consumer country supporting the Middle East energy market
    • - The Korean oil refining industry serves as a ‘value amplifying device’ for Middle Eastern crude oil
    • - ‘Priority supply’ is a demand fixation strategy, not supply stabilization
  • 4. Energy and logistics shocks become a reality... Full-fledged expansion of corporate risk
    • - Structural risk resulting from a combination of energy and logistics disruptions
    • - Key risks companies will face
  • 5. Strategy of Daeryun Law Firm, Corporate Legal Group
    • - Corporate Legal Group’s Response Strategy

1. Tensions in the Strait of Hormuz increase... A practical blockade structure in an open state

Currently, the Strait of Hormuz remains formally open, but the actual maritime navigation environment is virtually blockaded.

Iran officially maintains the position that it allows commercial vessel passage, but the possibility of actual passage of vessels is greatly limited due to the US military's sea control operations and the risk of military conflict.

Gap between ‘freedom of navigation’ under international law and reality

Article 38 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) guarantees the right of transit passage in international straits.

The Strait of Hormuz is also an international strait.

However, in real situations, legal rights are substantially limited by factors such as:

 

• Increased risk of ship attacks due to military tensions

• Possibility of laying sea mines

• Strengthen seizures and inspections of certain vessels

• War Risk Insurance soars

In other words, it is legally possible to pass, but economic and physical conditions make it virtually impossible.

2. The essence of the situation is not ‘production shortage’ but ‘transportation blockage’

In the past, energy crises were mainly caused by supply shortages due to reduced oil production, but this crisis is essentially a supply disruption caused by the blockage of maritime transportation routes.

Comparison of supply disruptions and increased production scale

division

black eye

daily supply disruption

Approximately 12 million barrels (IEA estimate)

OPEC+ production increase scale

Approximately 206,000 barrels

replenishment rate

About 1.7% level

This is a structural problem that cannot be solved by increasing production, and it is difficult to normalize supply unless stability in the Strait of Hormuz is secured.

3. “Give it to Korea first”… Hidden calculation of GCC priority supply declaration

Daeryun Corporate Law Group, Iran War, Strait of Hormuz crude oil supply priority

The decision by the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries to specify Korea as a ‘top priority energy supply target’ is not a diplomatic rhetoric, but a decision based on strategic judgment.

In a situation where the Strait of Hormuz risk has become a reality, supply priority is directly linked to market dominance.


The background to this declaration is not only Korea's demand structure but also its role within the global supply chain.

Korea is a key consumer country supporting the Middle East energy market

Korea has a structure that relies on the Middle East for about 69% of its total crude oil imports, Saudi Arabia is the largest crude oil supplier, and Qatar is a key country in LNG supply.

This structure isA strategic market that continues to generate stable and large-scale demandIt means.

In particular, for oil producing countries in the Middle East, it is very important to maintain a fixed source of demand such as Korea because the stability of demand is directly related to financial stability.

Therefore, the expression ‘highest priority supply’ is interpreted to mean making priorities clear in situations where supply capacity is limited.

The Korean oil refining industry serves as a ‘value amplifying device’ for Middle Eastern crude oil

The Korean oil refining industry has the ability to convert heavy oil from the Middle East, which has a high sulfur content and is highly refining difficult, into high value-added petroleum products through advanced facilities.

This is in the global energy supply chain.Acts as a processing and redistribution hubIt means to perform .

In fact, about 68.6% of U.S. aviation fuel imports come from Korea, and Australia also relies on Korea for about 25% of its petroleum product imports.

This structure is a factor that causes oil-producing countries in the Middle East to recognize Korea as a key partner connected to the global market.

‘Priority supply’ is a demand fixation strategy, not supply stabilization

If Korean oil refineries change their crude oil import structure to focus on light oil such as North Sea Brent crude or U.S. WTI through facility conversion in the future, demand for Middle Eastern crude oil may structurally decrease.

This is an important risk that directly leads to a decline in the market share of oil-producing countries in the Middle East.

Therefore, this ‘priority supply’ declaration goes beyond guaranteeing supply.Strategic measures to prevent the possibility of departure from Korea's supply chain and maintain long-term business relationshipsIt is reasonable to view it as

In other words, this is not consideration in a crisis situation.Active demand management strategy to maintain market dominanceno see.

4. Energy and logistics shocks become a reality... Full-fledged expansion of corporate risk

The virtual blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and supply instability from the Middle East are turning into real risks that have a direct impact on the entire domestic industry.

In particular, given that this situation is a structural crisis caused by a transportation blockage rather than a lack of production, it is characterized by complex risks such as energy procurement, logistics, and contracts occurring simultaneously for companies.

These changes are acting in a direction that goes beyond short-term cost increases and expands uncertainty throughout the supply chain.

Structural risk resulting from a combination of energy and logistics disruptions

The most important feature of this situation is that rising energy prices and logistics disruptions are occurring simultaneously.

Rising oil prices lead to an increase in the cost of electricity and gas as well as oil refining and petrochemicals, which directly increases the cost burden of major manufacturing industries such as steel, chemicals, and semiconductors.

In addition, the schedule for crude oil introduction itself is becoming uncertain due to delays in transit through the Strait of Hormuz, and increased vessel retention and route avoidance are leading to increased freight rates.

As a result, companies are faced with the risk of delivery delays, production disruptions, and contract defaults at the same time.

In particular, this crisis has the characteristic that a large risk gap between companies can occur depending on inventory management and logistics strategies because transportation is limited even though supply exists.

Key risks companies will face

division

Highlights

Energy procurement risk

Rising crude oil prices, supply delays

Logistics and transportation risks

Rising sea freight rates, shipping delays, increased insurance premiums

supply chain risk

Uncertainty in supply of raw materials, production schedule disruption

Contractual and legal risks

Delays in supply and non-compliance with contracts

financial risk

Increased costs and worsening profitability

5. Strategy of Daeryun Law Firm, Corporate Legal Group

In this situation, Force Majeure may be an issue due to war and strait blockade, and actual liability exemption depends on the contract provisions.

Additionally, the application of Article 79 of the CISG and liability for damages due to delays in shipment and delivery may become major issues.

Accordingly, companies need to check their contract structure in advance and prepare a legal response system to prepare for the possibility of disputes.

Corporate Legal Group’s Response Strategy

▶ Review all supply contracts and transportation contracts and block legal risks

▶ Determine whether Force Majeure applies and establish immunity response strategy

▶ Analysis of liability structure for damages related to delays in shipment and delivery

▶ Redesign of energy procurement contract structure and establishment of risk sharing system

▶ Advance preparation of governing laws and arbitration provisions in preparation for international trade disputes

Daeryun Law Firm's Corporate Legal Group comprehensively analyzes complex risks across energy, logistics, and international transactions and provides practical legal advice throughout the entire process, from contract structure inspection to dispute response.

If you are facing various risks such as supply delays, contract disputes, cost increases, etc., Daeryun Law Firm 🔗Corporate Legal GroupPlease review the contract structure and prepare a response strategy.

Background

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's exclusive AI · IT
litigation strategies
Over 260
key members
1,200+ cases
handled monthly

* 2026년 1월 변호사협회 경유증표 발급 기준

*Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 Paragraph 1

Attorney
Legal consultation booking

All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.

Phone
consultation 1800-7905

Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

Phone booking

KakaoTalk
consultation

KakaoTalk channel

Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

KakaoTalk booking

Online
consultation

We provide tailored
legal services.

Online booking
Related Information
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk