CONTENTS
- 1. The Client Who Came to the Seocho Attorney Office

- - How the Client Came to the Seocho Attorney Office
- - Statutes Relevant to the Case, Explained by the Seocho Law Office
- 2. Establishing a Strategy at the Seocho Law Office

- - The Seocho Law Office Argues That the Client Is Deeply Remorseful
- - The Seocho Law Office Argues That the Client Is a First-Time Offender
- - The Seocho Law Office Argues That the Client's Offense Was Impulsive
- 3. Following Assistance From the Seocho Law Office, a Minor Fine Was Imposed

- - If You Wish to Visit the Seocho Law Office
1. The Client Who Came to the Seocho Attorney Office

The client who visited the Seocho attorney’s office faced charges of obstruction of official duties and requested the assistance of the Seocho attorney in order to avoid an actual custodial sentence in the proceedings.
How the Client Came to the Seocho Attorney Office
After conducting an interview with the client at the Seocho attorney’s office, the Seocho attorney was able to understand the case in detail.
The client drank alcohol at a bar and did not pay, which led to a report being made.
Upon hearing the police officer who responded to the report tell him to pay the bill, the client became angry, swore, and pushed the officer’s chest.
Having thereby committed 🔗obstruction of official duties, the client, in order to defend against the proceedings, held a consultation at the Seocho attorney’s office and then requested the assistance of the Seocho attorney.
Statutes Relevant to the Case, Explained by the Seocho Law Office
The 🔗Seocho attorney of the Seocho attorney’s office explained in detail the statutory provisions concerning obstruction of official duties.
(1) A person who commits assault or intimidation against a public official engaged in the performance of his or her duties shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than five years or by a fine not exceeding ten million won.
(2) The same punishment as in the preceding paragraph shall apply to a person who commits assault or intimidation for the purpose of compelling or obstructing a public official to perform an act in connection with his or her duties, or causing the official to resign from office.
(1) When a person commits the crimes under Article 136, Article 138, or Articles 140 through the preceding Article by displaying the collective power of an organization or a multitude, or by carrying a dangerous object, the punishment prescribed in each respective Article shall be increased by up to one-half.
(2) When a person commits the crime under paragraph (1) and thereby causes injury to a public official, that person shall be punished by imprisonment for a definite term of not less than three years. When death is caused, the punishment shall be life imprisonment or imprisonment for not less than five years.
2. Establishing a Strategy at the Seocho Law Office
After conducting a thorough consultation at the Seocho attorney’s office, the Seocho attorney established a strategy of assistance for the client.
The Seocho Law Office Argues That the Client Is Deeply Remorseful
The client cooperated with the investigation and regretted the alleged conduct.
The Seocho attorney’s office argued that the client acknowledged all of the facts charged and was deeply remorseful.
The Seocho Law Office Argues That the Client Is a First-Time Offender
The Seocho attorney’s office emphasized that the client was a first-time offender with no criminal record whatsoever.
It was argued that the client diligently worked at his company and demonstrated compliance with the legal order.
The Seocho Law Office Argues That the Client's Offense Was Impulsive
The client pushed the police officer’s chest once, but no serious consequence such as injury resulted.
The Seocho attorney’s office argued that the client’s conduct was a spontaneous offense that occurred when he suddenly awoke after falling asleep while intoxicated.
3. Following Assistance From the Seocho Law Office, a Minor Fine Was Imposed
The client who visited the Seocho attorney’s office was charged with obstruction of official duties for causing a disturbance toward the police officer who responded to the bar’s report.
Through the assistance of the Seocho attorney, the client was able to avoid an actual custodial sentence and instead receive a minor fine in the proceedings.
If You Wish to Visit the Seocho Law Office
The client who visited the Seocho attorney's office requested the assistance of a Seocho attorney in a case involving obstruction of official duties.
As a result of the Seocho attorney's assistance, the client avoided an actual custodial sentence and received a fine.
The client again expressed gratitude to the attorney at the Seocho attorney's office.
At Daeryun Law Firm, attorneys establish reasonable and appropriate case strategies based on their experience in handling a variety of matters.
If you have become involved in obstruction of official duties as described above, you may wish to seek a consultation with Daeryun Law Firm, which provides consultations and response throughout the year. 🔗Consult with Daeryun Law Firm.

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.









