Ulsan Defamation Attorney Assistance Case | Acquittal for a Client Charged with Defamation

The circumstances of the client who came to the Ulsan defamation attorney to request assistance are as follows.

The client began to quarrel after a difference of opinion arose during a conversation with Mr. A, with whom he worked at a café.

Angered, the client continued the dispute, loudly mentioning a private matter concerning Mr. A.

Mr. A filed a complaint against the client on the ground that the client had publicly stated facts in the presence of other employees, thereby damaging his reputation.

Afterward, the court rendered a verdict of 'acquittal' on this case at the first instance, but the prosecutor filed an appeal.

The client came to the Ulsan defamation attorney in order to proceed with the case together with an experienced attorney who has handled numerous 🔗defamation/dissemination of false information cases and to resolve the problem promptly.

For this charge to be established, the following requirements must be met.

If all of the above requirements are satisfied, this charge may be found, and a person may be punished.

This crime may be accompanied not only by criminal punishment but also by a civil claim for damages, so careful response is needed.

The client was the subject of a complaint on the ground that he had damaged the victim's reputation in the presence of another employee.

However, the employee who heard the statement at the time was a person in a particularly close relationship with the victim, and the situation was one in which the likelihood that the content of the conversation would be leaked externally was extremely low.

This corresponds to a case where there is a high expectation of confidentiality, and as a result, publicity may be regarded as negated.

Accordingly, it was emphasized that the element of publicity, among the elements of the crime of defamation, was not satisfied.

While the client was in an argument with the victim, the victim said something to the effect of "say whatever you want," and the client, in a heightened emotional state, made the remark in question.

However, since the remark was not made with an intent to harm the victim's reputation, it is difficult to find that there was intent to defame.

The defense therefore emphasized that the element of intent, among the elements of the crime of defamation, was not satisfied.

This crime requires complex judgments regarding the statement of facts and the expression of opinion, public interest, and grounds for excluding illegality, so it is advisable to receive assistance from a specialized attorney.

At Daeryun, 🔗criminal law attorneys with extensive know-how establish tailored strategies through accurate ascertainment of the facts and thorough review of legal principles, and resolve cases promptly.

The firm also provides follow-up management services, such as responding promptly when an additional lawsuit is filed and supporting programs for psychological stability and emotional support.

If you are facing difficulty after being involved in a criminal case, please entrust your case through an Ulsan attorney 🔗legal consultation booking.