I got involved in a voice phishing case without knowing it.

浏览量2,382

Hello. I'm a business owner running a small to medium-sized manufacturing company. A few days ago, an employee was injured in a traffic accident on the way to work and wants to file an industrial accident claim with the Korea Workers' Compensation & Welfare Service. But the company thinks since it wasn't a work-time accident but a personal commuting accident, it might not qualify as an industrial accident. In this case, does the company have to process it as a commuting industrial accident? I'm also wondering if the criteria differ when an accident occurs on a company-operated commuter bus.

voice phishing

相关咨询的解答

作者: 박동일

If you temporarily delivered your bankbook and card after being deceived with the promise of a loan, simply lending the access medium or temporarily allowing its use is generally not subject to criminal punishment.

The "Electronic Financial Transactions Act" prohibits the act of transferring or receiving access mediums such as bankbooks, cards, and certificates, but the "transfer" referred to here means a permanent and substantial transfer of authority, and does not include temporarily allowing use.

However, whether the act of delivering the access medium included intent to commit a voice phishing crime is judged individually based on the specific circumstances of the case.

That is, if you did not know the purpose of the voice phishing crime and merely temporarily delivered your bankbook, the possibility of being subject to criminal punishment is low. The fact that the prosecutor has already issued a non-prosecution disposition can also be seen as a result of considering this point.

However, you must keep records of case-related documents or summons requests, etc., to prevent future problems.

If you have any questions related to voice phishing, please check anytime through consultation with a criminal specialist attorney.