页面标题背景 PC版本页面标题背景 移动版本

案例分析 / 法律动向

在各业务领域均具备专业能力的大律法律法人,
为您带来司法判决与法律议题的分析解读。

Acceleration of global supply chain reorganization... Strategic movement of Korean companies to India and Vietnam

The global supply chain environment is rapidly changing due to the deepening conflict between the US and China, the spread of protectionism, and increasing geopolitical risks.

Accordingly, major Korean companies are moving away from the existing efficiency-centered production structure and pursuing a structural transformation centered on supply chain stability and distribution strategies.

In this article, we analyze the trends of corporate strategy change centered on India and Vietnam and examine the implications of these changes.

CONTENTS
  • 1. The global supply chain is shaking: the starting point for corporate strategy transformation
    • - Supply chain vulnerabilities revealed by the pandemic
    • - Increasing conflict between the US and China and policy risks
    • - Geopolitical risks and logistics instability
  • 2. ‘Stability’ takes priority over cost: Changes in corporate strategy standards
    • - Limitations and risk concentration of single production structure
    • - Supply chain decentralization and shift to multi-site strategy
  • 3. Supply chain reorganized to India and Vietnam: Shifting the pivot of strategy
    • - Vietnam: Upgrading into a manufacturing hub
    • - India: A strategic base that secures both production and markets
  • 4. Risks increase as supply chains become more dispersed: new challenges facing companies
    • - Possible risks
    • - Legal disputes that may arise
  • 5. Global business structure must change from the design stage
    • - Strategic assistance from corporate legal group

1. The global supply chain is shaking: the starting point for corporate strategy transformation

These days, the global supply chain is in a completely different environment than in the past.

The standards by which companies design their production and procurement structures are themselves changing.

In the past, production cost reduction and efficiency were key criteria, but recently supply chain maintainability and risk management have become more important criteria.

These changes are the result of a combination of factors rather than a specific event.

In particular, the supply chain disruptions that companies actually experienced after the 2020 pandemic are evaluated as a key factor that triggered the strategy shift.

Supply chain vulnerabilities revealed by the pandemic

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the shutdown of factories in Wuhan and Guangdong, China had a direct impact on the overall global manufacturing industry.

For example, according to market analysis firm AutoForecast Solutions, as of 2021, the automobile industry has experienced production disruptions of more than 7.7 million units due to a shortage of semiconductors.

In addition, the Shanghai Container Freight Index (SCFI), a global maritime freight index, soared from about 1,000 in 2020 to more than 5,000 in 2021, resulting in a 4 to 5-fold increase in logistics costs.

This experience served as an opportunity for the company to reexamine the standards of its supply chain strategy.

Rather than a structure that minimizes production costs, it is recognized that it is necessary to build a distributed structure so that risks in specific regions do not affect overall production.This has spread.

Increasing conflict between the US and China and policy risks

The conflict between the US and China is another key factor in changing the supply chain structure.

For example, the United States provides subsidies for semiconductor production through the CHIPS and Science Act (2022), while also imposing restrictions on investment in cutting-edge semiconductors in China.

Additionally, the U.S. Department of Commerce is strengthening the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to restrict exports of semiconductor equipment and technology to China.

These regulations are creating a structure where, from a company’s perspective, “choosing a production location means choosing regulatory risks.”

This is because if you focus your production in a specific country, your entire business may be affected by policy changes surrounding that country.

Geopolitical risks and logistics instability

The war between Russia and Ukraine had a direct impact on the energy and raw material supply chain.

Rising natural gas prices and a surge in prices of major metals such as nickel and aluminum have changed the cost structure of the entire manufacturing industry.

As tensions in the Middle East increase and maritime risks in the Red Sea are added, supply chain uncertainty is further expanding.

Some shipping companies are choosing the African route instead of the Suez Canal, which is increasing both shipping times and costs.

These changes are making procurement schedules and production plans difficult to predict, and the need for companies to design their supply chains more flexibly is increasing.

2. ‘Stability’ takes priority over cost: Changes in corporate strategy standards

New Southern Policy Changes in corporate strategy standards

Companies are now prioritizing “a structure that maintains supply” rather than “the cheapest production location.”

This shows that the basis of supply chain strategy is moving from a cost focus to a stability focus.

Limitations and risk concentration of single production structure

The existing China-centered production structure was very effective in terms of cost reduction and production efficiency.

In fact, global companies have long maintained a strategy of concentrating production in China, which has advantages in terms of labor costs and infrastructure.

However, this structure has the problem that risks are concentrated in specific regions.

division

detail

merit

Low production costs, high production efficiency

margin

Increased risk due to concentration in supply chain

result

Total production disruption in case of external shock

Ultimately, companies are faced with a situation where they need to simultaneously consider a structure that can distribute risks while maintaining production efficiency.

Supply chain decentralization and shift to multi-site strategy

To compensate for these limitations, companies are revising their strategies to disperse their production bases.

This approach is closer to redesigning the entire supply chain rather than adding a production base.

 

•  Diversification of production base: Move away from China-centered structure and move production to Vietnam, India, Mexico, etc.

•  Supply chain dualization: Key parts are procured from multiple countries

•  Adjust your inventory strategy: Securing a certain level of safety stock in the minimum inventory method

These changes are leading to a structure in which supply chain functions are divided by region.

Production is relocated to Southeast Asia and India, research and development functions are maintained in the home country or in some key locations, and market response is centered on local consumption.

This multi-base structureA solution to prevent the entire supply chain from being interrupted simultaneously even if a problem occurs in a specific region.It is a system.

At the same time, it can be understood as a strategy to secure both efficiency and stability by dividing functions by region.

3. Supply chain reorganized to India and Vietnam: Shifting the pivot of strategy

Supply chain decentralization strategies are taking shape in the form of expanded investments in specific regions.

Currently, global companies are moving to the stage of establishing new core bases, and at the centerIndia and VietnamThis is located.

Vietnam: Upgrading into a manufacturing hub

Vietnam is a country that has already established itself as an important production base in the global manufacturing industry.

Especially for Korean companiesA large-scale production infrastructure has been established centered around Samsung Electronics, and it plays a key role in the overall electronics and components industry.I'm doing it.

Recently, there has been a trend of expanding beyond simple assembly-oriented production to include research and development functions, and Samsung Electronics' Hanoi R&D Center operation is a representative example of this change.

Additionally, the Vietnamese government is actively seeking to attract foreign investment by pursuing policies to foster semiconductor and high-tech industries.

This is acting as a factor accelerating the transition from a production base to a technology-based industrial base.

However, Vietnam still has limitations such as a lack of advanced technical manpower and an immature parts supply chain, so it is currently reasonable to evaluate it as a complementary base to disperse manufacturing functions rather than a structure that completely replaces China.

India: A strategic base that secures both production and markets

India is playing an important role in reshaping supply chains in a different way than Vietnam.

The biggest characteristic is that it is both a production base and a huge consumer market.

The domestic market, which is based on a population of approximately 1.4 billion people, provides companies with a long-term demand base and forms a structure that can simultaneously promote local production and market entry.

This is why major companies, including Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics, are expanding their production facilities in India.

Also, the Indian governmentActively promotes foreign investment attraction by introducing the PLI (Production Linked Incentive) system to foster the manufacturing industry.I'm doing it.

This provides a policy basis for global companies to relocate their production bases.

However, India is evaluated as a market with high operational risk after entry due to the complexity of administrative procedures, lack of infrastructure, and possible regulatory changes.

4. Risks increase as supply chains become more dispersed: new challenges facing companies

The current supply chain reorganization is not a ‘de-China’ trend that replaces a specific country, but rather a process of transition to a multipolar structure that divides functions and roles into multiple regions.

This structure has the effect of increasing supply stability, but at the same time, it comes with new risks as country-specific regulations and transaction structures become more complex.

Ultimately, instead of reducing production risks, companies find themselves in a situation where the legal and institutional variables that need to be managed are further expanded.

Possible risks

Risk type

Highlights

regulatory risk

Possibility of delays in licensing and changes in business structure due to differences in laws and investment regulations by country

contract risk

Multinational transaction structure makes contractual relationships complicated and scope of responsibility unclear.

supply chain risk

As production and parts procurement is distributed across multiple countries, some delays can lead to disruptions in overall production.

logistics risk

Delivery delays and freight rate fluctuations occur due to diversification of transportation routes and geopolitical variables.

conflict risk

Due to the increase in international transactions, jurisdictional and governing law issues arise and dispute resolution is prolonged.

Legal disputes that may arise

Issue type

Highlights

investment structure

Possibility of disputes regarding shares, management rights, and profit distribution when establishing a joint venture (JV)

Licensing and Regulation

Investment approval by country, industry regulations, foreign investment restrictions, etc.

contract structure

Scope of responsibility and risk allocation issues between supply, logistics, and distribution contracts

labor and tax

Application of local labor laws, transfer pricing issues

intellectual property rights

Rights protection issues during technology transfer and joint development

5. Global business structure must change from the design stage

New Southern Policy Response Strategy of Daeryun Corporate Law Group

Depending on the design, investment method, contract structure, and risk allocation have a direct impact on the likelihood of future disputes and response costs.

As the supply chain spans multiple countries, a structural design that comprehensively considers the laws and regulations of each country is needed.

Strategic assistance from corporate legal group

In an environment where the global supply chain is multipolar, legal review at the business structure design stage serves as a key element of corporate risk management.

Accordingly, the Corporate Legal Group provides practical assistance in the following areas.

 

• Consulting on an integrated structure that reflects equity structure, distribution of management rights, and exit conditions at the overseas investment and joint venture (JV) design stage

• Precise design of responsibility scope and risk distribution structure between supply, logistics, and distribution contracts when establishing a multinational supply chain contract system

• Advance review of entry structure and establishment of response strategy reflecting country-specific licensing, foreign investment regulations, and industrial policies

• Transfer pricing, cost risk preliminary analysis and structural design according to application of local tax and labor regulations

• Design of intellectual property rights ownership and protection system that may arise during technology transfer and joint development

 

In particular, Daeryun Law FirmEstablishing a collaboration infrastructure optimized for companies entering the New Southern region through a close MOU with a local Vietnamese law firm.I'm doing it.

Through this, we provide one-stop quick response strategies and effective legal advice according to changes in local laws.
 

If you want to systematically manage legal risks from the structural design stage during the global business expansion process,corporate lawyerPlease respond proactively based on professional advice.

背景

大伦的核心优势

大伦律所独有的 AI·IT
技术应用诉讼策略
260名以上
核心成员
每月 1,200+
案件受理量

* 2026년 1월 변호사협회 경유증표 발급 기준

*遵守大韩律协广告规定第4条第1项

律师
法律咨询预约

所有咨询都将在专业律师审核案件后进行,
为了专业地进行,将采用预约制。

请尽早预约咨询,
请遵守预约时间。
我们将尽力提供令您满意的咨询服务。

电话
咨询 1800-7905

365天24小时
可受理咨询

电话预约

Kakao
咨询

Kakao Talk频道

大伦法律法人 律师

Kakao预约

在线
咨询

为您提供
定制化法律服务。

在线预约
相关信息
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk