CONTENTS
- 1. Tensions in the Strait of Hormuz increase... A practical blockade structure in an open state

- - Gap between ‘freedom of navigation’ under international law and reality
- 2. The essence of the situation is not ‘production shortage’ but ‘transportation blockage’

- - Comparison of supply disruptions and increased production scale
- 3. “Give it to Korea first”… Hidden calculation of GCC priority supply declaration

- - Korea is a key consumer country supporting the Middle East energy market
- - The Korean oil refining industry serves as a ‘value amplifying device’ for Middle Eastern crude oil
- - ‘Priority supply’ is a demand fixation strategy, not supply stabilization
- 4. Energy and logistics shocks become a reality... Full-fledged expansion of corporate risk

- - Structural risk resulting from a combination of energy and logistics disruptions
- - Key risks companies will face
- 5. Strategy of Daeryun Law Firm, Corporate Legal Group

- - Corporate Legal Group’s Response Strategy
1. Tensions in the Strait of Hormuz increase... A practical blockade structure in an open state
Currently, the Strait of Hormuz remains formally open, but the actual maritime navigation environment is virtually blockaded.
Iran officially maintains the position that it allows commercial vessel passage, but the possibility of actual passage of vessels is greatly limited due to the US military's sea control operations and the risk of military conflict.
Gap between ‘freedom of navigation’ under international law and reality
Article 38 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) guarantees the right of transit passage in international straits.
The Strait of Hormuz is also an international strait.
However, in real situations, legal rights are substantially limited by factors such as:
• Possibility of laying sea mines
• Strengthen seizures and inspections of certain vessels
• War Risk Insurance soars
In other words, it is legally possible to pass, but economic and physical conditions make it virtually impossible.
2. The essence of the situation is not ‘production shortage’ but ‘transportation blockage’
In the past, energy crises were mainly caused by supply shortages due to reduced oil production, but this crisis is essentially a supply disruption caused by the blockage of maritime transportation routes.
Comparison of supply disruptions and increased production scale
division | black eye |
daily supply disruption | Approximately 12 million barrels (IEA estimate) |
OPEC+ production increase scale | Approximately 206,000 barrels |
replenishment rate | About 1.7% level |
This is a structural problem that cannot be solved by increasing production, and it is difficult to normalize supply unless stability in the Strait of Hormuz is secured.
3. “Give it to Korea first”… Hidden calculation of GCC priority supply declaration

The decision by the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries to specify Korea as a ‘top priority energy supply target’ is not a diplomatic rhetoric, but a decision based on strategic judgment.
In a situation where the Strait of Hormuz risk has become a reality, supply priority is directly linked to market dominance.
The background to this declaration is not only Korea's demand structure but also its role within the global supply chain.
Korea is a key consumer country supporting the Middle East energy market
Korea has a structure that relies on the Middle East for about 69% of its total crude oil imports, Saudi Arabia is the largest crude oil supplier, and Qatar is a key country in LNG supply.
This structure isA strategic market that continues to generate stable and large-scale demandIt means.
In particular, for oil producing countries in the Middle East, it is very important to maintain a fixed source of demand such as Korea because the stability of demand is directly related to financial stability.
Therefore, the expression ‘highest priority supply’ is interpreted to mean making priorities clear in situations where supply capacity is limited.
The Korean oil refining industry serves as a ‘value amplifying device’ for Middle Eastern crude oil
The Korean oil refining industry has the ability to convert heavy oil from the Middle East, which has a high sulfur content and is highly refining difficult, into high value-added petroleum products through advanced facilities.
This is in the global energy supply chain.Acts as a processing and redistribution hubIt means to perform .
In fact, about 68.6% of U.S. aviation fuel imports come from Korea, and Australia also relies on Korea for about 25% of its petroleum product imports.
This structure is a factor that causes oil-producing countries in the Middle East to recognize Korea as a key partner connected to the global market.
‘Priority supply’ is a demand fixation strategy, not supply stabilization
If Korean oil refineries change their crude oil import structure to focus on light oil such as North Sea Brent crude or U.S. WTI through facility conversion in the future, demand for Middle Eastern crude oil may structurally decrease.
This is an important risk that directly leads to a decline in the market share of oil-producing countries in the Middle East.
Therefore, this ‘priority supply’ declaration goes beyond guaranteeing supply.Strategic measures to prevent the possibility of departure from Korea's supply chain and maintain long-term business relationshipsIt is reasonable to view it as
In other words, this is not consideration in a crisis situation.Active demand management strategy to maintain market dominanceno see.
4. Energy and logistics shocks become a reality... Full-fledged expansion of corporate risk
The virtual blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and supply instability from the Middle East are turning into real risks that have a direct impact on the entire domestic industry.
In particular, given that this situation is a structural crisis caused by a transportation blockage rather than a lack of production, it is characterized by complex risks such as energy procurement, logistics, and contracts occurring simultaneously for companies.
These changes are acting in a direction that goes beyond short-term cost increases and expands uncertainty throughout the supply chain.
Structural risk resulting from a combination of energy and logistics disruptions
The most important feature of this situation is that rising energy prices and logistics disruptions are occurring simultaneously.
Rising oil prices lead to an increase in the cost of electricity and gas as well as oil refining and petrochemicals, which directly increases the cost burden of major manufacturing industries such as steel, chemicals, and semiconductors.
In addition, the schedule for crude oil introduction itself is becoming uncertain due to delays in transit through the Strait of Hormuz, and increased vessel retention and route avoidance are leading to increased freight rates.
As a result, companies are faced with the risk of delivery delays, production disruptions, and contract defaults at the same time.
In particular, this crisis has the characteristic that a large risk gap between companies can occur depending on inventory management and logistics strategies because transportation is limited even though supply exists.
Key risks companies will face
division | Highlights |
Energy procurement risk | Rising crude oil prices, supply delays |
Logistics and transportation risks | Rising sea freight rates, shipping delays, increased insurance premiums |
supply chain risk | Uncertainty in supply of raw materials, production schedule disruption |
Contractual and legal risks | Delays in supply and non-compliance with contracts |
financial risk | Increased costs and worsening profitability |
5. Strategy of Daeryun Law Firm, Corporate Legal Group
In this situation, Force Majeure may be an issue due to war and strait blockade, and actual liability exemption depends on the contract provisions.
Additionally, the application of Article 79 of the CISG and liability for damages due to delays in shipment and delivery may become major issues.
Accordingly, companies need to check their contract structure in advance and prepare a legal response system to prepare for the possibility of disputes.
Corporate Legal Group’s Response Strategy
▶ Determine whether Force Majeure applies and establish immunity response strategy
▶ Analysis of liability structure for damages related to delays in shipment and delivery
▶ Redesign of energy procurement contract structure and establishment of risk sharing system
▶ Advance preparation of governing laws and arbitration provisions in preparation for international trade disputes
Daeryun Law Firm's Corporate Legal Group comprehensively analyzes complex risks across energy, logistics, and international transactions and provides practical legal advice throughout the entire process, from contract structure inspection to dispute response.
If you are facing various risks such as supply delays, contract disputes, cost increases, etc., Daeryun Law Firm 🔗Corporate Legal GroupPlease review the contract structure and prepare a response strategy.



















